From the FDA-approved label: Mechanism of Action Vepdegestrant is a heterobifunctional protein degrader that binds to estrogen receptor (ER) and the E3 ligase cereblon (CRBN). This interaction results in the degradation cascade through CRBN-mediated polyubiquitination and degradation of ER by the proteasome, leading to reduction of ER protein levels in breast cancer cells. Vepdegestrant induced degradation of wild-type (WT) and mutant ER, inhibited ER-dependent breast cancer cell line proliferation in vitro and demonstrated antitumor activity in vivo in both WT and mutant ESR1 breast cancer models.
What happened in people
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
§ A fixed RNAWiki sentence
Where this came from
Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.
No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.
No source is stored against this line.
The limit that matters most
Not recorded.
Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
Professional supervision is normally required. A regulator classifies this substance in a way that restricts how it is supplied.
What the registries record it as
The substance registry classes this as chemical.
FDA substance registry · WC1U3R1YMI · read 2026-08-29
Its recorded molecular formula is C45H49N5O4, weighing 723.90 Daltons.
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
Where each sentence above came from
The recorded explanation is written in label language rather than for a beginner. The page opens with what it is taken for instead, and the recorded explanation follows below.
Shown as the opening line on this page.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 115 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Biomarker
A biomarker is a number from a test that stands in for something about health.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A biomarker is like a fuel gauge.
Where that stops being true. A gauge is wired to the tank. Many biomarkers are only loosely tied to health.
What people get wrong. A better number is read as a better life. Several medicines improved a number and helped nobody.
A measurable indicator used as a substitute for a clinical outcome of interest.
Stand-in result
A stand-in result is a number measured because the real result takes too long.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
It is like judging a journey by the speedometer rather than by arriving.
Where that stops being true. Speed does predict arrival. Many stand-in results do not predict the real one.
What people get wrong. A stand-in result is often reported as the result itself.
A surrogate endpoint substituted for a clinical endpoint, valid only where the substitution has been shown to hold.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What happened in people
Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1- All Randomized Participants
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT05654623
How many people
624
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Number of participants with dose-limiting toxicities in the Dose Escalation Arms.
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT04606446
How many people
320
Study design
Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Part A: Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of ARV-471
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT04072952
How many people
217
Study design
Phase 1/Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Percent Reduction in Ki-67 Expression From Baseline to Day 15 in Tumor Biopsies
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT05549505
How many people
152
Study design
Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT06206837
How many people
71
Study design
Phase 1/Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Study Lead-in (SLI): Incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT05909397
How many people
59
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
■Living longer, or avoiding a major eventEvidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.1 registered measure of this kind. 1 written-up study measured this and did not show a benefit.
□What a body can do day to dayNo evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
□Measured performanceNo evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
□Symptoms and quality of lifeNo evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.No registered study measures this.
■A number that stands in for healthEvidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.1 registered measure of this kind.
■A step measured inside a personEvidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
□AnimalsNo evidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.No animal record is stored.
■Cells in a dishEvidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
□A guess from softwareNo evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Felt, measured, or meaningful
Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.
Felt
Things a person could notice without a test.
No registered study measured anything of this kind.
Measured
Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.
maximum plasma concentration of rosuvastatin
Meaningful
Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.
phase 3 progression free survival
A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.
Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.
Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.
Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.
Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.
Names that fit none of the three (5)
pfs by bicr assessment per recist v1 1 esr1 mutation
study lead in incidence of grade 4 neutropenia
sli incidence of dose reduction
sli incidence of drug discontinuation
phase 1b number of dose limiting toxicities
These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How long anything takes
Nine different lengths of time that get confused with each other. None of them is worked out from another.
Before anything is noticed.RNAWiki does not store this separately, and never works it out from another figure on this page.
Before a test result moves.RNAWiki does not store this separately, and never works it out from another figure on this page.
Before performance moves.RNAWiki does not store this separately, and never works it out from another figure on this page.
How long the result was watched.No finished study window is recorded for a study that tested this substance.
How long people took it.How long people actually took it is not stored. The study window is not the same thing.
How long people were followed.Follow-up length is not stored separately. It is never read off the study window, which would be a different thing.
How fast the body clears it. 19 hours hours
Read from the label, which states: “Elimination Vepdegestrant effective elimination half-life is 19 hours (50%) with an apparent (oral) clearance of 12 L/h (36%).”
How long effects linger.RNAWiki does not store this separately, and never works it out from another figure on this page.
Beyond the studies. Nothing is recorded about the long term.
The longest finished study sets the edge of what anyone measured.
A study window is not how long people took it, and neither is how long they were followed. Where RNAWiki holds only one of the three, it shows one.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
People similar to this profile were included.
VEPPANU is indicated for the treatment of adults with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) -mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as detected by an FDA-authorized test, with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy.
Who is missing from the studies
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What the label states about particular groups
On pediatric, the label states: “The safety and effectiveness of VEPPANU in pediatric patients have not been established.”
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
On older people, the label states: “Of 313 patients who received VEPPANU in the VERITAC-2 study, 39% were 65 years of age or older and 13% were 75 years of age or older.”
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
On people who are pregnant, the label states: “Risk Summary Based on findings in animals and its mechanism of action, VEPPANU can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.1 ) ].”
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
On people who are breastfeeding, the label states: “Risk Summary There are no data on the presence of vepdegestrant or its metabolites in human milk, or its effects on milk production or the breastfed child.”
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
Where the result stopped carrying
This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely.
On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.
It was studied in different people
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
The evidence may simply be wrong
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Prescription only
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Oral
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form and route recorded on this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
Professional supervision is normally required. A regulator classifies this substance in a way that restricts how it is supplied.
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Suppression classes recorded: S3.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Sold as tablet, tablet, film coated, given by the oral route.
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
# Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to take∅Nothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
∅Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Oral
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form used in the studies cited on this page.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
5 products list this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. 5 of them contain it and nothing else.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 84043-200 · read 2026-08-29
They are sold as powder, tablet and tablet, film coated, taken oral.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 84043-200 · read 2026-08-29
2 published labels name it as an active ingredient. 2 of them describe this substance alone, which is where its own label text on this page comes from.
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-29
Those labels are classed as human prescription drug.
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-29
VEPPANU is oral at 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Tablets: 100 mg blue film-coated, immediate release, round tablet debossed with "VEP" on one side and "100" on the other side. 200 mg blue film-coated, immediate release, oval tablet debosse…, recorded as fda label in effect 2026-06-12 in the United States.
US prescribing information · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · read 2026-08-30
Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What you could measure
This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.
Self-experiment planning is not offered for a prescription or clinician-supervised medicine. The questions below are for a clinician or pharmacist.
Questions worth asking
Which of the trials of Vepdegestrant studied people like me?
What was measured, and for how long?
Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
What would we watch for, and when would we stop?
Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.
RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What nobody knows yet
Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.
How much did people take in the studies?
The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.
Why it matters. A result belongs to an amount. Without the amount the result floats free.
What would answer it
A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing populations
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing long-term data
No completed tested study window is recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
No reviewed conclusion
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing interaction studies
No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Formulation uncertainty
Several salts, forms or products of Vepdegestrant are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Mechanism not reviewed
No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Check any of this yourself
Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.
How many documents were read
2 documents were read for this substance.
RNAWiki source record
2 of them state the same halfLife, and they agree.
RNAWiki source record
2 of them state the same proteinBinding, and they agree.
RNAWiki source record
2 of them state the same volumeOfDistribution, and they agree.
RNAWiki source record
Where else this substance is registered
FDA substance identifier (UNII)
WC1U3R1YMI
RxNorm concept
2743355
Checks this page had to pass
✓ Passed
Identity resolved
no open identity hold
✓ Passed
No unresolved merge across substance families
no quarantine open
✓ Passed
Every public sentence names a source
The opening statement carries the origin: Written into the record, not signed off.
✗ Not passed
Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence
No registered study is classified as testing this substance.
✓ Passed
No internal keys in reader text
enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
✓ Passed
Safety mode resolved
Suppression classes recorded: S3.
✓ Passed
Canonical metadata present
slug and display name present
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How this medicine reached us
Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.
What the approval register records
1 approved application covers products containing this substance. The earliest was NDA219835, approved 20260501 to RIGEL PHARMS.
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
6 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
What was measured, goal by goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
Recorded evidence blocks (10)
Q2
What did Vepdegestrant's largest trial (624 people) and its longest (5.2 years) measure?
624 people in Vepdegestrant's largest registered study, 5.2 years in its longest registered window, measuring Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of ARV-471. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
11 phase1, 3 phase2, 2 phase3; NCT05654623; 2028-05-15; no ageing endpoint recorded. Last human test completed 2025, NCT06911788.
Interpretation These counts include studies where Vepdegestrant was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.
Show the evidence
phase1
11
phase2
3
phase3
2
Last recorded human testNCT06911788
2025-06-13
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q3
Vepdegestrant was tested only in human — what did it show?
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of ARV-471 — the recorded outcome words.
Show the evidence
humanNCT05538312
biomarker; Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of ARV-471; 14
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q4
Vepdegestrant's half-life is 19 hours — which schedules were studied?
19 hours, the half-life Vepdegestrant's label states. openfda-label · 484e21ba-8fe1-4c6d-b923-8ba4cf5b2f20 · 2026-08-30
Show the evidence
half life
19 hours hours; Elimination Vepdegestrant effective elimination half-life is 19 hours (50%) with an apparent (oral) clearance of 12 L/h (36%).
tmax
Absorption Vepdegestrant median (min, max) time to maximum plasma concentration (T max ) is approximately 6 (4, 8) hours.
metabolism
Metabolism Vepdegestrant is primarily metabolized through direct sulfation via multiple SULT isoforms and oxidation via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5.
recorded 2026-08-30 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q5
Which of maximum plasma concentration of rosuvastatin, pfs by bicr assessment per recist v1 1 esr1 mutation and phase 1b number of dose limiting toxicities did Vepdegestrant's trials measure?
maximum plasma concentration of rosuvastatin, pfs by bicr assessment per recist v1 1 esr1 mutation and phase 1b number of dose limiting toxicities lead 7 outcome terms across Vepdegestrant's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
sli incidence of dose reduction, sli incidence of drug discontinuation, phase 3 progression free survival and phase 1b number of dose limiting toxicities follow.
Show the evidence
maximum plasma concentration of rosuvastatin
1
pfs by bicr assessment per recist v1 1 esr1 mutation
1
study lead in incidence of grade 4 neutropenia
1
sli incidence of dose reduction
1
sli incidence of drug discontinuation
1
phase 3 progression free survival
1
1 more recorded row
phase 1b number of dose limiting toxicities
1
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q6
Which of Vepdegestrant's 6 ongoing trials reports first?
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLTs) During First Treatment Cycle; Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1- All Randomized…; latest 2028-05-15
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT05463952
"A Study to Learn About the Vepdegestrant (ARV-471, PF-07850327) in People With ER+/HER2- Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (BC)"; n 6; "Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLTs) During First Treatment Cycle"; 2025-03-31
NCT05654623
"A Study to Learn About a New Medicine Called Vepdegestrant (ARV-471, PF-07850327) in People Who Have Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer"; n 624; "Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1- All Randomized Participants"; 2028-05-15
NCT05909397
"Vepdegestrant (ARV-471/PF-07850327) + Palbociclib vs Letrozole + Palbociclib in ER(+)/HER2(-) Advanced Breast Cancer"; n 59; "Study Lead-in (SLI): Incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia"; 2026-12-30
NCT06125522
"TACTIVE-U: A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine (Vepdegestrant) When Given With Other Medicines in People With Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. (Sub-Study C)"; n 11; "Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities"; 2026-12-31
NCT06206837
"A Study to Learn About Vepdegestrant When Given With PF-07220060 to People With Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer."; n 71; "Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities"; 2026-09-07
NCT07231991
"A Study to Learn How the Body Processes the Study Medicine Called Vepdegestrant in People With Loss of Liver Function"; n 24; "Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) for vepdegestrant"; 2026-12-23
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q7
Which running trial of Vepdegestrant could settle lifespan?
NCT05654623 measures Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1- All Randomized Participants, reading out 2028-05-15.
1 open trial; n 624; "A Study to Learn About a New Medicine Called Vepdegestrant (ARV-471, PF-07850327) in People Who Have Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer"
Show the evidence
TrialNCT05654623
"A Study to Learn About a New Medicine Called Vepdegestrant (ARV-471, PF-07850327) in People Who Have Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer"; n 624; "Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1- All Randomized Participants"; 2028-05-15
Q8
Which 3 trials of Vepdegestrant posted no result?
Posted no result
3 of 3 completed trials
Registrations
NCT06005688, NCT06256510 and NCT06275841
Completion dates
oldest 2023-11-21; newest 2024-05-24
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT06005688
2023-11-21
NCT06256510
2024-05-13
NCT06275841
2024-05-24
Q9
At the median, Vepdegestrant's trials enrolled 13.5 people — anything larger?
Median enrolment
13.5
Largest enrolment
624
Registered trials counted
14
Q10
Vepdegestrant and BCRP, CYP2C8 and CYP2C9: shared by which compounds?
BCRP, CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 appear in Vepdegestrant's recorded interaction sentences, 10 in all. openfda-label+europepmc · 2026-08-30
Interpretation clinical_pharmacology
Show the evidence
CYP1A2clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP2B6clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP2C19clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP2C8
clinical_pharmacology
Metabolism Vepdegestrant is primarily metabolized through direct sulfation via multiple SULT isoforms and oxidation via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5.
clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP2C9
clinical_pharmacology
Metabolism Vepdegestrant is primarily metabolized through direct sulfation via multiple SULT isoforms and oxidation via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5.
clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP2D6clinical_pharmacology
In vitro studies: CYP450 Enzymes: Vepdegestrant does not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19.Vepdegestrant is an inhibitor of CYP2B6.
CYP3A4clinical_pharmacology
Metabolism Vepdegestrant is primarily metabolized through direct sulfation via multiple SULT isoforms and oxidation via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5.
CYP3A5clinical_pharmacology
Metabolism Vepdegestrant is primarily metabolized through direct sulfation via multiple SULT isoforms and oxidation via CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5.
recorded 2026-08-30 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q11
What is recorded about Vepdegestrant and mTOR?
"Vepdegestrant-induced robust tumor regressions in combination with each of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib; the mTOR inhibitor everolimus; and the PI3K inhibitors alpelisib and inavolisib." — where Vepdegestrant and mTOR appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2024-08-01
mTOR; PMID 38819400
Show the evidence
mTORPMID 38819400
"Vepdegestrant-induced robust tumor regressions in combination with each of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib; the mTOR inhibitor everolimus; and the PI3K inhibitors alpelisib and inavolisib."
recorded 2024-08-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registeredIdentifiers, relations and other names
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work
✗ required summary fields resolved: 4 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
✓ public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
✓ source coverage passed: 7 source rows
✓ no critical contamination: no quarantine open
✓ canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
✓ no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.