Trifolium Pratense Flower
- Plant preparation
- Prescription only
- Identity checked
- Sources last checked 2026-09-04
This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.
RNAWiki holds very little about this substance. The page shows what there is.
What Trifolium Pratense Flower does in the body
RNAWiki has not recorded what this substance changes in the body.
What happened in people
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
A fixed RNAWiki sentence
Where this came from
Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.
No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.
No source is stored against this line.
The limit that matters most
Not recorded.
- Where it acts
- Not recorded.
- Kind of result
- No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
- Supervision
- Not usually supervised: sold as a supplement or food ingredient where recorded. That is a legal category, not a safety judgement.
What the registries record it as
The substance registry classes this as structurallydiverse.
FDA substance registry · 4JS0838828 · read 2026-08-29
It is recorded as coming from TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE WHOLE. The part recorded is flower.
FDA substance registry · 4JS0838828 · read 2026-08-29
The organism is Trifolium pratense, a species. It is also called peavine clover, purple clover and red clover.
NCBI Taxonomy · 57577 · read 2026-08-29
Where each sentence above came from
No plain explanation of what this changes is stored.
No recorded use is stored in reader language.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 26 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Stand-in result
A stand-in result is a number measured because the real result takes too long.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
It is like judging a journey by the speedometer rather than by arriving.
Where that stops being true. Speed does predict arrival. Many stand-in results do not predict the real one.
What people get wrong. A stand-in result is often reported as the result itself.
A surrogate endpoint substituted for a clinical endpoint, valid only where the substitution has been shown to hold.
Enzyme
An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.
Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.
What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.
A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.
Receptor
A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.
Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.
What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.
A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.
Pathway
A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A pathway is like a row of dominoes.
Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.
What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.
An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.
What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed
What was measured, goal by goal
One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.
Registered studies list 6 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.
There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.
| Goal | Life outcome | What a body can do | How a person feels | A test result | A step in the body | Harms | How long | Who was studied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal. | Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal. | Waiting for a reviewer1 registered symptom measure. | Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal. | Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal. | Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal. | Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded. | Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page. |
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
- Pain
- pain intensity measure
Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.
What each mark on this table means
- Nothing in the sources checked
- No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
- Waiting for a reviewer
- 1 registered symptom measure.
- Not recorded
- Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.
What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
- Living longer, or avoiding a major event Evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.1 registered measure of this kind. No reviewed result.
- What a body can do day to day No evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
- Measured performance No evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
- Symptoms and quality of life Evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.1 registered measure of this kind.
- A number that stands in for health Evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.1 registered measure of this kind.
- A step measured inside a person Evidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
- Animals Evidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in Mouse, Rat, Dog. A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
- Cells in a dish Evidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
- A guess from software No evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed
Felt, measured, or meaningful
Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.
Felt
Things a person could notice without a test.
- pain intensity measure
Measured
Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.
- hemoglobin level
Meaningful
Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.
- death or neurodevelopmental impairment
A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.
Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.
Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.
Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.
Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.
Names that fit none of the three (3)
- hospital stay
- rate of recurrence
- blood loss
These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.
What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
People similar to this profile were included.
- & Usage ■ temporarily protects minor ■ rashes ■ cracked skin ■ red bumps ■ helps prevent and temporarily protects and helps relieve ■ chapped or cracked skin ■ helps prevent and protect from the drying effects of wind and cold weather ■ temporarily protects and helps relieve minor skin irritation…
Who is missing from the studies
- Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Where the result stopped carrying
- This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
- It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
The studies measured something else entirely.
On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
- A different form was studied
- The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- There was nothing to correct
- Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- Something else had to happen too
- In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- The change is too small to feel
- A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- Day-to-day swing hides it
- Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- Not enough time yet
- The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- It was not taken as studied
- Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- Something else changed at the same time
- Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- The product may not be what it says
- Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
- No recorded reason
- RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Prescription only
Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Oral
Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form and route recorded on this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
Not usually supervised: sold as a supplement or food ingredient where recorded. That is a legal category, not a safety judgement.
Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
The identity record classes it as a supplement ingredient; no medicines register records an approval.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Sold as liquid, spray, pellet, salve, given by the oral, topical, sublingual route.
Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to takeNothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Oral
Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form used in the studies cited on this page.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
85 products list this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. None of them contains it on its own, so nothing on this page can separate it from what it is combined with.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 83027-0052 · read 2026-08-29
They are sold as cream, liquid, pellet, salve, solution/ drops and spray, taken oral, sublingual and topical.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 83027-0052 · read 2026-08-29
85 published labels name it as an active ingredient. None of them describes this substance alone, so no label text on this page can be attributed to it rather than to a combination.
US prescribing information · a6aab63a-9313-4490-b3a4-0b08f7753cc5 · read 2026-08-29
Those labels are classed as human otc drug.
US prescribing information · a6aab63a-9313-4490-b3a4-0b08f7753cc5 · read 2026-08-29
Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.
What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed
What you could measure
This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.
A single-person plan is offered only as a structure for observing yourself. It never calculates an amount to take, and it cannot prove cause.
Questions worth asking
- Which of the trials of Trifolium Pratense Flower studied people like me?
- What was measured, and for how long?
- Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
- What would we watch for, and when would we stop?
Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.
RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.
What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed
What nobody knows yet
Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.
How much did people take in the studies?
The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.
Why it matters. A result belongs to an amount. Without the amount the result floats free.
What would answer it
A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
How fast does the body clear it?
The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.
Why it matters. Without this, nothing on this page can say how long anything lasts.
What would answer it
A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing populations
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing long-term data
No completed tested study window is recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
No reviewed conclusion
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing interaction studies
No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Formulation uncertainty
Several salts, forms or products of Trifolium Pratense Flower are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Mechanism not reviewed
No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed
Check any of this yourself
Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.
Where else this substance is registered
- FDA substance identifier (UNII)
- 4JS0838828
- CAS registry number
- 85085-25-2
- RxNorm concept
- 1310039
- European Chemicals Agency number
- 285-356-7
Checks this page had to pass
Passed
Identity resolved
no open identity hold
Passed
No unresolved merge across substance families
no quarantine open
Not passed
Every public sentence names a source
The opening statement carries no source: the record holds neither an explanation nor a recorded use.
Not passed
Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence
No registered study is classified as testing this substance.
Passed
No internal keys in reader text
enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
Passed
Safety mode resolved
The identity record classes it as a supplement ingredient; no medicines register records an approval.
Passed
Canonical metadata present
slug and display name present
What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed
How this medicine reached us
Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.
What the approval register records
The earliest marketing start date recorded for a listed product is 19840815.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 83027-0052 · read 2026-08-29
What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed
What to learn next
Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.
- Were people like me actually studied?
- How close is this evidence to something I would notice?
- What does nobody know about this yet?
- What is a stand-in result?
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
7 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
- What happened in people — found nothing in the sources checked.
- The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
- How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
- What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
- Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
- Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
- What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
Recorded evidence blocks (9)
What did Trifolium Pratense Flower's largest trial (529 people) and its longest (9.6 years) measure?
529 people in Trifolium Pratense Flower's largest registered study, 9.6 years in its longest registered window, measuring assessment of mortality. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
8 na, 2 phase4, 1 phase2, 1 phase3; NCT01029353; 2019-08; no ageing endpoint recorded. Last human test completed 2023, NCT06052982.
Interpretation These counts include studies where Trifolium Pratense Flower was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.
Show the evidence
- na8
- phase42
- phase21
- phase31
- Last recorded human test NCT060529822023-07-10
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
From mouse to human: where has Trifolium Pratense Flower shown lifespan?
mouse: mechanism-only, rat: mechanism-only, dog: mechanism-only and human: lifespan (11): the rungs where Trifolium Pratense Flower has a recorded finding. Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov · organism ladder · 2026-09-01
Interpretation assessment of mortality — the recorded outcome words.
Show the evidence
- mousemechanism-only
- ratmechanism-only
- dogmechanism-only
- human NCT00823485lifespan; assessment of mortality; 11
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
More Trifolium Pratense Flower was worse in human: at what point?
U-shaped in human: "The modified configuration incorporated a U-shaped drainage pathway and a suboccipital fluid collection system to optimize irrigation control and minimize overflow into nonsterile areas." Europe PMC · dose-response search · 2026-06-21
3 recorded sentences naming Trifolium Pratense Flower; U-shaped, dose-response
Show the evidence
U-shaped
- PMID 41241379"The modified configuration incorporated a U-shaped drainage pathway and a suboccipital fluid collection system to optimize irrigation control and minimize overflow into nonsterile areas."
- PMID 41229867"We have improved them and created the U-shaped threshold-balanced extensive pleural lavage drainage system (UTB-EPLDS)."
- dose-response PMID 42488283"While individual structural deformities are known to impede sinus drainage, the cumulative "dose-response" impact of concurrent OMC variants on microscopic mucosal remodeling remains under-investigated."
recorded 2026-06-21 · last checked 2026-09-04
Could one person measure Trifolium Pratense Flower's effect on hospital stay?
Hospital stay: measured in Trifolium Pratense Flower's trials.
Interpretation hospital stay is the recorded endpoint.
Show the evidence
biomarkers
- hospital stay; 2026-09-01
- death or neurodevelopmental impairment; 2026-09-01
- rate of recurrence; 2026-09-01
- pain intensity measure; 2026-09-01
- hemoglobin level; 2026-09-01
- blood loss; 2026-09-01
- human trials at or under302
- Not recorded for this substancea recorded half-life
- smallest human trial19; NCT00823485; PHASE2/PHASE3; the smallest recorded human enrolment at or below 30; the registry states no direction of its result; COMPLETED
Which of blood loss, death or neurodevelopmental impairment and hemoglobin level did Trifolium Pratense Flower's trials measure?
blood loss, death or neurodevelopmental impairment and hemoglobin level lead 6 outcome terms across Trifolium Pratense Flower's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
Interpretation pain intensity measure, hemoglobin level and blood loss follow.
Show the evidence
- hospital stay1
- death or neurodevelopmental impairment1
- rate of recurrence1
- pain intensity measure1
- hemoglobin level1
- blood loss1
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Which 7 trials of Trifolium Pratense Flower posted no result?
- Posted no result
- 7 of 7 completed trials
- Registrations
- NCT00823485, NCT03231423, NCT04333979, NCT00775034, NCT03145493 and NCT04486040, and 1 more
- Completion dates
- oldest 2009-12; newest 2023-07-10
Show the evidence
Trial
- NCT008234852009-12
- NCT032314232017-06-22
- NCT043339792017-06-22
- NCT007750342018-05-24
- NCT031454932019-01-31
- NCT044860402020-03-13
- 1 further recorded trial NCT060529822023-07-10
At the median, Trifolium Pratense Flower's trials enrolled 66 people — anything larger?
- Median enrolment
- 66
- Largest enrolment
- 529
- Registered trials counted
- 11
Was Trifolium Pratense Flower studied with exercise?
exercise is named in Trifolium Pratense Flower's label sentences: "<i>Background:</i> To compare the effects of conventional approaches based on compression stockings and preventive measures with a combined program including these techniques, together with therapeutic exercise and self-manual lymphatic drainage instructed by a physiotherapist on functionality,…" openfda-label+europepmc · 2026-01-19
1 recorded statement; exercise
Show the evidence
- exercise<i>Background:</i> To compare the effects of conventional approaches based on compression stockings and preventive measures with a combined program including these techniques, together with therapeutic exercise and self-manual lymphatic drainage instructed by a physiotherapist on functionality, general physical activity, and oedema in individuals with chronic venous insufficiency. <i>Patients and…
recorded 2026-01-19 · last checked 2026-09-04
What is recorded about Trifolium Pratense Flower and sirtuin?
"Furthermore, Askn significantly enhanced lymphatic drainage, as indicated by ICG signal intensity, and modulated the SIRT1/NLRP3 pathway." — where Trifolium Pratense Flower and sirtuin appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2026-02-06
sirtuin, IGF-1, autophagy; PMID 41652600, 38951079, 40189841, 35909583
Show the evidence
sirtuin
- PMID 41652600"Furthermore, Askn significantly enhanced lymphatic drainage, as indicated by ICG signal intensity, and modulated the SIRT1/NLRP3 pathway."
- PMID 41652600"CONCLUSION: Askn alleviates GA symptoms by enhancing lymphatic drainage and upregulating SIRT1 expression, which subsequently inhibits NLRP3-mediated inflammation."
- IGF-1 PMID 38951079"The drainage fluid of the uterine cavity was collected using syringes through the proximal end of the drainage channel switch at 24 hours after the surgery and through the drainage channel directly at 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the surgery, and the levels of related cytokines including platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), insulin-like…"
autophagy
- PMID 40189841"Long-term cLE not only directly impairs brain wastes (amyloid beta, phosphorylated tau [p-tau]) drainage, but also activates the Erk1/2 signaling pathway leading to attenuation of autophagy."
- PMID 35909583"The rats were separated into two groups that received the autophagy activator rapamycin (RAPA) or the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) to further investigate whether biliary drainage could alleviate the inflammatory response, oxidative stress, mitochondrial complex IV damage, and thus barrier damage in rats with OJ."
- IGF-1 PMID 35087972"Anyway, the best treatment is prevention, so we must be very attentive at patients with risk factors for developing the NVG. <b>Abbreviations:</b> NVG = neovascular glaucoma, ICA = iridocorneal angle, IOP = intraocular pressure, TM = trabecular meshwork, AH = aqueous humor, AC = anterior chamber, PRP = panretinal photocoagulation, VEGF = vascular endothelial growing factor, Anti-VEGF = anti-…"
recorded 2026-02-06 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registered
Identifiers, relations and other names
The exact record
- UNII
- 4JS0838828
- CAS number
- 85085-25-2
- RxCUI
- 1310039
- Trade name
- Drainpar, Pollen-Weeds, Bone Liquescence, Chemtox, Drainage, Weed Grass Antigens, Drainpar / Pollen-Weeds / Bone Liquescence / Chemtox / Drainage / Weed Grass Antigens
- Also called
- CLOVER TOPS, RED, EXTRACT SOLID, COW CLOVER FLOWER, MEADOW CLOVER FLOWER, PURPLE CLOVER FLOWER, RED CLOVER FLOWER, TRIFOLIUM BORYSTHENICUM FLOWER, TRIFOLIUM BRACTEATUM FLOWER, TRIFOLIUM LENKORANICUM FLOWER, TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE, TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE (CLOVER) FLOWER EXTRACT
- Development code
- FEMA NO. 2326
Sources (8)
Sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 snapshot 2026-09-01T09:00:05 ·
- this record's own fields 2,3,5 ·
- Europe PMC dose-response search ·
- Europe PMC pathway abstract search ·
- Europe PMC search ·
- Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov organism ladder ·
2 more sources
- openfda-label+europepmc K1:4JS0838828 ·
- national registers CA ·
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work
How these records are assembled · Which registers were checked
Index-quality checks
- identity passed: no open identity hold
- required summary fields resolved: 4 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
- public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
- source coverage passed: 8 source rows
- no critical contamination: no quarantine open
- canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
- no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.