2 registered substances share the start of this name, which is why a search for it can return more than one thing.
FDA substance registry · D9MB6E21RX · read 2026-08-29
Where each sentence above came from
No plain explanation of what this changes is stored.
No recorded use is stored in reader language.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 26 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Protein
A protein is a folded chain your body builds to do a specific job.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A protein is like a tool bent into one shape for one task.
Where that stops being true. A tool keeps its shape. A protein can change shape and stop working.
What people get wrong. Protein in food and a protein in the body are related but not the same thing.
A polymer of amino acids folded into a defined structure that determines its function.
Enzyme
An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.
Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.
What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.
A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.
Receptor
A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.
Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.
What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.
A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.
Pathway
A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A pathway is like a row of dominoes.
Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.
What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.
An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What happened in people
Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.
Number of Participants From Randomization to First Occurrence of Death From MACE-3 [Composite Endpoint of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Stroke]
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT04255433
How many people
13299
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Percent (%) Change from Baseline in Body Weight at Week 72
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT07351045
How many people
2000
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (10 mg and 15 mg)
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT03987919
How many people
1879
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
The relief of rheumatoid arthritis symptoms and the improvement of functions assessed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set measures.
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT01600521
How many people
1748
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
What a body can do day to day
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Event Free Survival (RT2)
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT04625907
How many people
1672
Study design
Phase 1/Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Percent (%) Change from Baseline in Body Weight at Week 72
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT07351058
How many people
1600
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
□Living longer, or avoiding a major eventNo evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.0 registered measures of this kind. 2 written-up studies measured this and did not show a benefit.
□What a body can do day to dayNo evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
□Measured performanceNo evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
□Symptoms and quality of lifeNo evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.No registered study measures this.
□A number that stands in for healthNo evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.No registered study measures this.
□A step measured inside a personNo evidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.No registered study measures this.
■AnimalsEvidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in Drosophila (fruit fly), Mouse, Rat. A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
■Cells in a dishEvidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
□A guess from softwareNo evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
No description of who was studied is recorded.
Who is missing from the studies
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Where the result stopped carrying
This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
It was studied in different people
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
The evidence may simply be wrong
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (11)
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Varies by country
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No form or route is recorded.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
Not usually supervised: sold as a supplement or food ingredient where recorded. That is a legal category, not a safety judgement.
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
The identity record classes it as a supplement ingredient; no medicines register records an approval.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing is recorded about product quality.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
# Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to take∅Nothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
∅Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
The exact form studied is not recorded.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
49 marketed supplement labels list this ingredient, classed as other combinations, single vitamin and mineral and protein.
Those labels carry all other, nutrient and structure/function claims. A claim of that kind is written by the manufacturer and is not assessed by any regulator, so its presence says nothing about whether it is true.
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
9 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
What was measured, goal by goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
Felt, measured, or meaningful — found nothing in the sources checked.
How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
How this medicine reached us — found nothing in the sources checked.
What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
3 of 8 rungs carry a finding; no outcome wording is recorded.
Show the evidence
Drosophila
lifespan
mouse
mechanism-only
rat
mechanism-only
recorded 2026-01-15 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q3
More Polypeptide was worse in rat: at what point?
U-shaped in rat: "This purple phototroph contains PufX, a polypeptide crucial for dimerization of the light-harvesting 1-reaction center (LH1-RC) complex, but lacks protein-U, a U-shaped polypeptide in the LH1-RC of its close relative Rba. sphaeroides." Europe PMC · dose-response search · 2025-04-11
3 recorded sentences naming Polypeptide; U-shaped, biphasic
Show the evidence
U-shapedPMID 36792596
"This purple phototroph contains PufX, a polypeptide crucial for dimerization of the light-harvesting 1-reaction center (LH1-RC) complex, but lacks protein-U, a U-shaped polypeptide in the LH1-RC of its close relative Rba. sphaeroides."
biphasic
PMID 40214665
"Herein the biphasic polymerization platform is reported for the easy access of a series of crosslinked PEG-polypeptide nanoparticles for enhanced drug loading and selective drug release."
PMID 35570810
"Herein, we report a facile and efficient strategy to prepare the conjugates with well-controlled polypeptide chain length (<i>l</i><sub>p</sub>) directly from unmodified polysaccharides via a biphasic solution ring-opening polymerization."
recorded 2025-04-11 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q4
Was Polypeptide studied with fasting and exercise?
fasting and exercise are named in Polypeptide's label sentences: "Fasting cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon and leptin decreased (p < 0.001), while glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (p = 0.004), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), PP, peptide YY (PYY), and subjective hunger (p < 0.001) increased over time for all participants, Postprandial AUCs were…" openfda-label+europepmc · 2026-06-16
2 recorded statements; fasting, exercise
Show the evidence
fasting
Fasting cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon and leptin decreased (p < 0.001), while glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (p = 0.004), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), PP, peptide YY (PYY), and subjective hunger (p < 0.001) increased over time for all participants, Postprandial AUCs were consistently higher in AL than SB for glucagon and PP (p < 0.001), and GIP and GLP-1 (p < 0.05).
exercise
For FM among Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists, tirzepatide showed the greatest reduction compared with placebo (MD -10.70 kg; 95% CI: -13.42 to -7.99), followed by liraglutide plus exercise.
recorded 2026-06-16 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q5
What is recorded about Polypeptide and AMPK?
"Resveratrol administration promoted the expression of phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (p-AMPK), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) in the myocardial tissue of mice, while lowering the elevated protein expression levels of p22 subunit (p22), guanine nucleotide-binding protein q polypeptide 1 (GP91), phosphorylated…" — where Polypeptide and AMPK appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2026-08-10
"Resveratrol administration promoted the expression of phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (p-AMPK), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) in the myocardial tissue of mice, while lowering the elevated protein expression levels of p22 subunit (p22), guanine nucleotide-binding protein q polypeptide 1 (GP91), phosphorylated inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (p-IRE1α), X-box binding protein…"
sirtuinPMID 38551444
"Resveratrol administration promoted the expression of phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (p-AMPK), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) in the myocardial tissue of mice, while lowering the elevated protein expression levels of p22 subunit (p22), guanine nucleotide-binding protein q polypeptide 1 (GP91), phosphorylated inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (p-IRE1α), X-box binding protein…"
autophagyPMID 42573895
"We highlight a hierarchical network in which 8 key miRNAs fine-tune responses. let-7 targeted Solute Carrier Family 34 Member 2 (SLC34A2) and Cystathionine Gamma-Lyase (CTH), coordinating ion transport and amino acid metabolism, respectively. miR-10 targeted genes Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) in energy homeostasis and TGF-Beta Activated Kinase 1 (MAP3K7) Binding Protein 1 (Table…"
NAD+PMID 42573895
"We highlight a hierarchical network in which 8 key miRNAs fine-tune responses. let-7 targeted Solute Carrier Family 34 Member 2 (SLC34A2) and Cystathionine Gamma-Lyase (CTH), coordinating ion transport and amino acid metabolism, respectively. miR-10 targeted genes Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) in energy homeostasis and TGF-Beta Activated Kinase 1 (MAP3K7) Binding Protein 1 (Table…"
"This study aims to evaluate the protective effects of dexmedetomidine-loaded polypeptide nanomicrospheres (PNM@Dex) in a mouse model of intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms, focusing on autophagy activation in enteric neurons."
mTORPMID 39878121
"Our findings uncover a novel role of EIF4EBP1 in improving protein quality control, presenting a promising therapeutic strategy for autophagy-related muscular disorders and potentially other conditions characterized by proteostatic imbalance.<b>Abbreviations</b>: 3-MA: 3-methyladenine; ACAC/ACC: acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; ATG5: autophagy related 5; ATG7:…"
AMPKPMID 39878121
"Our findings uncover a novel role of EIF4EBP1 in improving protein quality control, presenting a promising therapeutic strategy for autophagy-related muscular disorders and potentially other conditions characterized by proteostatic imbalance.<b>Abbreviations</b>: 3-MA: 3-methyladenine; ACAC/ACC: acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; ATG5: autophagy related 5; ATG7:…"
mTOR
"Metformin, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RAs, have been reported to have AMPK activating and mTORC1 inhibitory effects."
NAD+PMID 42331132
"Therapeutically, several agents show promise in modulating mitochondrial pathways, including sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRAs), as well as emerging interventions such as glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon receptor agonist, nicotinamide…"
recorded 2026-08-10 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registeredIdentifiers, relations and other names
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work
✗ required summary fields resolved: 3 required field(s) not terminal: Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
✓ public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
✓ source coverage passed: 7 source rows
✓ no critical contamination: no quarantine open
✓ canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
✓ no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.