Skip to content

Pimavanserin

  • Prescription medicine
  • Prescription only
  • Identity checked
  • Sources last checked 2026-09-04

This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.

What Pimavanserin does in the body

Hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis [see Clinical Studies (14) ]

From the FDA-approved label: The mechanism of action of pimavanserin in the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP is unclear. However, the effect of pimavanserin could be mediated through a combination of inverse agonist and antagonist activity at serotonin 5-HT 2A receptors and to a lesser extent at serotonin 5-HT 2C receptors.

What happened in people

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

A fixed RNAWiki sentence

Where this came from

Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.

No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.

No source is stored against this line.

The limit that matters most

Not recorded.

Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
Professional supervision is normally required. A regulator classifies this substance in a way that restricts how it is supplied.

What the registries record it as

  • The substance registry classes this as chemical.

    FDA substance registry · NA83F1SJSR · read 2026-08-29

Where each sentence above came from

No recorded sentence describes the change this makes in a way that stands on its own. The page opens with what it is taken for instead, and the recorded explanation follows below.

Shown as the opening line on this page.

No statement of the main limit is recorded.

The four opening statements run to 79 words.

Words this page uses

Four words worth knowing first

Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.

Biomarker

A biomarker is a number from a test that stands in for something about health.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A biomarker is like a fuel gauge.

Where that stops being true. A gauge is wired to the tank. Many biomarkers are only loosely tied to health.

What people get wrong. A better number is read as a better life. Several medicines improved a number and helped nobody.

A measurable indicator used as a substitute for a clinical outcome of interest.

Placebo

A placebo is a dummy treatment given so the real one can be compared with it.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A placebo is like a blank control in an experiment.

Where that stops being true. A blank does nothing. People given a placebo often do get better.

What people get wrong. A placebo effect is read as imaginary. The improvement is measured and real.

An inactive intervention matched in appearance to the test intervention, used to control for non-specific effects.

Comparator

A comparator is whatever the treatment was measured against.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

It is like the other runner in a race.

Where that stops being true. A race has one winner. A study can show both arms improved.

What people get wrong. Results are read without asking what the other group got. Beating nothing is not beating a treatment.

The control condition against which the experimental intervention is assessed.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What was measured, goal by goal

One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.

Registered studies list 7 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.

There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.

Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
GoalLife outcomeWhat a body can doHow a person feelsA test resultA step in the bodyHarmsHow longWho was studied
SleepNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Waiting for a reviewer1 registered symptom measure.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Sleep
insomnia severity index

Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.

What each mark on this table means
Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
Waiting for a reviewer
1 registered symptom measure.
Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What happened in people

Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT03121586
How many people
995
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT03575052
How many people
784
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT03623321
How many people
595
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Safety: Number (%) of Patients With Drug-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT00550238
How many people
459
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) Total Score - Change From Baseline to Week 26

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT04531982
How many people
454
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) Total Score

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT02970305
How many people
403
Study design
Phase 2
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How close this is to real life

The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.

  1. Living longer, or avoiding a major event No evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.No registered study measures this.
  2. What a body can do day to day No evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
  3. Measured performance No evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
  4. Symptoms and quality of life Evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.4 registered measures of this kind.
  5. A number that stands in for health No evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.No registered study measures this.
  6. A step measured inside a person Evidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
  7. Animals No evidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.No animal record is stored.
  8. Cells in a dish No evidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.No cell or bench record is stored.
  9. A guess from software No evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.

Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Felt, measured, or meaningful

Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.

Felt

Things a person could notice without a test.

  • cohen mansfield agitation inventory
  • insomnia severity index
  • mystical experience questionnaire
  • persisting effects questionnaire

Measured

Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.

No registered study measured anything of this kind.

Meaningful

Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.

No registered study measured anything of this kind.

A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.

Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.

Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.

Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.

Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.

Names that fit none of the three (3)
  • treatment emergent adverse events
  • recruitment rates
  • retention rates

These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Were people like you studied?

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.

Who was studied

People similar to this profile were included.

  • Pimavanserin capsule is indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis [see Clinical Studies (14) ]. Pimavanserin capsule is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis. (1)

Who is missing from the studies

  • Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What the label states about particular groups

  • On pediatric, the label states: “Safety and effectiveness of pimavanserin have not been established in pediatric patients.”

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-30

  • On older people, the label states: “No dose adjustment is required for elderly patients.”

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-30

  • On people who are pregnant, the label states: “Risk Summary There are no data on pimavanserin use in pregnant women that would allow assessment of the drug-associated risk of major congenital malformations or miscarriage.”

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-30

  • On people who are breastfeeding, the label states: “Risk Summary There is no information regarding the presence of pimavanserin in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production.”

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-30

Where the result stopped carrying

  • This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
  • It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Why it might seem to do nothing

A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.

It was studied for a different goal

The studies measured something else entirely.

On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.

It was studied in different people

The people in the studies were not much like the reader.

On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

The evidence may simply be wrong

Small early studies often do not hold up.

On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.

None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What taking it involves

The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.

How it is supplied

Prescription only

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

Read from the recorded approval status.

No source is stored against this line.

Form and route

Oral

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form and route recorded on this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

Who oversees it

Professional supervision is normally required. A regulator classifies this substance in a way that restricts how it is supplied.

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

Suppression classes recorded: S6.

No source is stored against this line.

What is in the pack

Sold as capsule, tablet, tablet, coated, given by the oral route.

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.

No source is stored against this line.

Where it is registered

Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.

Counted from records

Where this came from

A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.

Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.

No source is stored against this line.

Why people stop

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

What it would be like to takeNothing found in the sources checked

What can go wrong

Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Reports sent to a regulator

  • These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction.
  • Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing.
  • The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete.
  • News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report.
  • A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Pimavanserin appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 3 most-reported reaction terms, 17 reaction mentions were counted. One report can name several reactions.

The recorded terms (3)
  • therapeutic response unexpected — 8 reaction mentions
  • confusional state — 7 reaction mentions
  • parkinson's disease psychosis — 2 reaction mentions
  • open-targets-adr · recorded 2026-06-24 · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.

Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Does the exact form matter?

Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.

The form that was studied

Oral

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form used in the studies cited on this page.

No source is stored against this line.

What is sold

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.

No source is stored against this line.

What is recorded as being sold

  • 12 products list this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. 12 of them contain it and nothing else.

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 73435-002 · read 2026-08-29

  • They are sold as capsule, powder and tablet, coated, taken oral.

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 73435-002 · read 2026-08-29

  • The regulator's established pharmacologic class for it is atypical antipsychotic [epc].

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 73435-002 · read 2026-08-29

  • 2 published labels name it as an active ingredient. 2 of them describe this substance alone, which is where its own label text on this page comes from.

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-29

  • Those labels are classed as human prescription drug.

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-29

  • pimavanserin is oral at 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Pimavanserin capsules are available as: 34 mg strength capsules., recorded as fda label in effect 2023-11-01 in the United States.

    US prescribing information · 403b6540-c53d-4e92-91b4-36ca6338b2b1 · read 2026-08-30

Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What you could measure

This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.

Self-experiment planning is not offered for a prescription or clinician-supervised medicine. The questions below are for a clinician or pharmacist.

Questions worth asking

  • Which of the trials of Pimavanserin studied people like me?
  • What was measured, and for how long?
  • Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
  • What would we watch for, and when would we stop?

Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.

RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What nobody knows yet

Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.

Missing populations

Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing long-term data

No completed tested study window is recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

No reviewed conclusion

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing interaction studies

No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Formulation uncertainty

Several salts, forms or products of Pimavanserin are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Mechanism not reviewed

No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Check any of this yourself

Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.

How many documents were read

  • 2 documents were read for this substance.

    RNAWiki source record

  • 2 of them state the same tMax, and they agree.

    RNAWiki source record

Where else this substance is registered

FDA substance identifier (UNII)
NA83F1SJSR
RxNorm concept
2049275

Checks this page had to pass

  • Passed

    Identity resolved

    no open identity hold

  • Passed

    No unresolved merge across substance families

    no quarantine open

  • Passed

    Every public sentence names a source

    The opening statement carries the origin: Written into the record, not signed off.

  • Not passed

    Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence

    No registered study is classified as testing this substance.

  • Passed

    No internal keys in reader text

    enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

  • Passed

    Safety mode resolved

    Suppression classes recorded: S6.

  • Passed

    Canonical metadata present

    slug and display name present

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How this medicine reached us

Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.

What the approval register records

  • 7 approved applications cover products containing this substance. The earliest was NDA207318, approved 20160429 to ACADIA PHARMS INC.

    Drugs@FDA application register · NDA207318 · read 2026-08-29

  • Marketing status on the register: discontinued, none (tentative approval) and prescription.

    Drugs@FDA application register · NDA207318 · read 2026-08-29

  • The earliest marketing start date recorded for a listed product is 20160429.

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 73435-002 · read 2026-08-29

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What to learn next

Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.

This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.

What is not here

6 questions this page could not answer

These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.

  • The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.

The record as stored

The full record, for auditing

Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.

Recorded evidence blocks (10)

What did Pimavanserin's largest trial (995 people) and its longest (11 years) measure?


995 people in Pimavanserin's largest registered study, 11 years in its longest registered window, measuring Maximum concentration obtained (Cmax). ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

18 phase2, 15 phase3, 6 phase4, 2 early phase1, 2 phase1, 1 na, 1 na or unstated; NCT00550238; 2018-05-30; no ageing endpoint recorded. Last human test completed 2026, NCT06068465.

Interpretation These counts include studies where Pimavanserin was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.

Show the evidence
  • phase2
    18
  • phase3
    15
  • phase4
    6
  • early phase1
    2
  • phase1
    2
  • na
    1
2 more recorded rows
  • na or unstated
    1
  • Last recorded human test NCT06068465
    2026-02-01

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Pimavanserin was tested only in human — what did it show?


human: biomarker (42): the rungs where Pimavanserin has a recorded finding. Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov · organism ladder · 2026-09-01

Interpretation Maximum concentration obtained (Cmax) — the recorded outcome words.

Yeast C. elegans Drosophila Mouse Rat Dog Non-human primate Human biomarker
Show the evidence
  • human NCT06450184
    biomarker; Maximum concentration obtained (Cmax); 42

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

5 of Pimavanserin's trials stopped: safety, accrual/recruitment, funding/business, other?


safety (2), accrual/recruitment (1), funding/business (1) and other (1): Pimavanserin's stop wording, clustered. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

"The study was terminated for business reasons and not due to safety concerns."; 5 of 42 registered studies

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT04000009
    terminated; "The study was terminated for business reasons and not due to safety concerns."
  • NCT04164758
    terminated; "Study enrollment impacted by COVID-19 pandemic and Sponsor terminated for business reasons"
  • NCT04809116
    withdrawn; "Received alternative sources of funding."
  • NCT05555615
    terminated; "The study was terminated for business reasons and not due to safety concerns."
  • NCT05796167
    withdrawn; "The PI did not have eligible candidates. Therefore, Acadia Pharmaceuticals (the sponsor) closed the study."

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Human studies of Pimavanserin used Pimavanserin 34 mg — over how long?


studies of Pimavanserin used the recorded amount. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

4 recorded entries; human; also "Pimavanserin 34 mg", "Pimavanserin 20 mg", "NUPLAZID 34 MG Oral Capsule"

Show the evidence

human

  • NCT02992132
    Pimavanserin 34 mg
  • NCT02992132
    Pimavanserin 20 mg
  • NCT06450184
    NUPLAZID 34 MG Oral Capsule
  • NCT07022366
    Pimavanserin 10mg

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which of cohen mansfield agitation inventory, insomnia severity index and mystical experience questionnaire did Pimavanserin's trials measure?


cohen mansfield agitation inventory, insomnia severity index and mystical experience questionnaire lead 7 outcome terms across Pimavanserin's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

Interpretation retention rates, insomnia severity index, mystical experience questionnaire and persisting effects questionnaire follow.

Show the evidence
  • cohen mansfield agitation inventory
    1
  • treatment emergent adverse events
    1
  • recruitment rates
    1
  • retention rates
    1
  • insomnia severity index
    1
  • mystical experience questionnaire
    1
1 more recorded row
  • persisting effects questionnaire
    1

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which of Pimavanserin's 9 ongoing trials reports first?


9 registered trials of Pimavanserin are open; earliest completion 2026-09. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

CGI-I Psychosis; Change in 5HT2A receptor density measured using the PET radioligand MH.MZ; latest 2028-12

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT04373317
    "Pimavanserin vs. Quetiapine for Treatment of Parkinson's Psychosis"; n 358; "CGI-I Psychosis"; 2028-08-24
  • NCT05357612
    "Characterization of the Serotonin 2A Receptor Selective PET Tracer [18F]MH.MZ in Patients With Neurodegenerative Diseases"; n 75; "Change in 5HT2A receptor density measured using the PET radioligand MH.MZ"; 2027-08
  • NCT05441280
    "Pimavanserin for Insomnia in Veterans With PTSD"; n 60; "Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)"; 2027-07-12
  • NCT05590637
    "Comparing Antipsychotic Medications in LBD Over Time"; n 94; "Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), Hallucinations + Delusions (H+D)"; 2027-02
  • NCT05895513
    "Pimavanserin and Aggression and Social Cognition."; n 35; "Aggressive Responding on the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP)"; 2028-01
  • NCT06455293
    "Psilocybin Therapy for Depression in Parkinson's Disease"; n 60; "Evaluate the efficacy of psilocybin for improving depression in people living with Parkinson's disease"; 2028-06
3 further recorded trials
  • NCT06592833
    "Psilocybin With Pimavanserin Compared to Psilocybin Alone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder"; n 60; "Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30) Score"; 2028-03-01
  • NCT07022366
    "Investigating the Neuropsychological Effects of 5-HT2a Antagonism"; n 80; "Sensitivity to loss and reward"; 2026-09
  • NCT07610135
    "Psilocybin Efficacy With or Without Pimavanserin Pretreatment"; n 20; "Persisting Effects Questionnaire (PEQ) score"; 2028-12

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which 5 trials of Pimavanserin posted no result?


Posted no result
5 of 5 completed trials
Registrations
NCT00087542, NCT00361166, NCT00086294, NCT04794413 and NCT06450184
Completion dates
oldest 2005-12; newest 2024-03-09
Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT00087542
    2005-12
  • NCT00361166
    2007-03
  • NCT00086294
    2007-11-15
  • NCT04794413
    2021-02-28
  • NCT06450184
    2024-03-09

At the median, Pimavanserin's trials enrolled 111 people — anything larger?


Median enrolment
111
Largest enrolment
995
Registered trials counted
41

What do 17 spontaneous reports say about Pimavanserin — and not say?


These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction. Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing. The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete. News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report. A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Pimavanserin appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 3 most-reported reaction terms, 17 reaction mentions were counted: therapeutic response unexpected 8; confusional state 7; parkinson's disease psychosis 2. open-targets-adr · CHEMBL2111101 · 2026-06-24

Show the evidence
  • therapeutic response unexpected
    8
  • confusional state
    7
  • parkinson's disease psychosis
    2

recorded 2026-06-24 · last checked 2026-09-04

Pimavanserin and CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6: shared by which compounds?


CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 appear in Pimavanserin's recorded interaction sentences, 12 in all. openfda-label+europepmc · 2026-08-30

Interpretation pharmacokinetics

Show the evidence

CYP1A2

  • pharmacokinetics
    Based on in vitro data, pimavanserin is not an irreversible inhibitor of any of the major hepatic and intestinal human CYP enzymes involved in drug metabolism (CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4).
  • pharmacokinetics
    AC-279 is neither a reversible or irreversible (metabolism-dependent) inhibitor of any of the major hepatic and intestinal human CYP enzymes involved in drug metabolism (CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4).
  • CYP2D6 pharmacokinetics
    Elimination Metabolism Pimavanserin is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and to a lesser extent by CYP2J2, CYP2D6, and various other CYP and FMO enzymes.
  • CYP2J2 pharmacokinetics
    Elimination Metabolism Pimavanserin is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and to a lesser extent by CYP2J2, CYP2D6, and various other CYP and FMO enzymes.

CYP3A4

  • pharmacokinetics
    Elimination Metabolism Pimavanserin is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and to a lesser extent by CYP2J2, CYP2D6, and various other CYP and FMO enzymes.
  • pharmacokinetics
    CYP3A4 is the major enzyme responsible for the formation of its major active metabolite (AC-279).
  • pharmacokinetics
    Pimavanserin does not cause clinically significant CYP inhibition or induction of CYP3A4.
  • pharmacokinetics
    CYP3A4 Inducer: In a clinical study where single doses of 34 mg pimavanserin were administered on Days 1 and 22, and 600 mg rifampin, a strong inducer of CYP3A4, was given daily on Days 15 through 21, pimavanserin C max and AUC decreased by 71% and 91%, respectively, compared to pre-rifampin plasma concentrations.
  • pharmacokinetics
    In a simulation with a moderate CYP3A4 inducer (efavirenz), physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models predicted pimavanserin C max,ss and AUC tau at steady state decreased by approximately 60% and 70%, respectively [see Dosage and Administration (2.3) and Drug Interactions (7.1) ] .
  • pharmacokinetics
    Drug Interaction Studies CYP3A4 Inhibitor: ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4, increased pimavanserin C max by 1.5-fold and AUC by 3-fold.
1 more recorded row
  • CYP3A4 pharmacokinetics
    There is no effect of pimavanserin on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate, or carbidopa/levodopa as shown in Figure 2 .
  • CYP3A5 pharmacokinetics
    Elimination Metabolism Pimavanserin is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and to a lesser extent by CYP2J2, CYP2D6, and various other CYP and FMO enzymes.

recorded 2026-08-30 · last checked 2026-09-04

Where it is registered
Identifiers, relations and other names

The exact record

ChEMBL id
CHEMBL2111101
PubChem CID
10071196
CAS number
706779-91-1
RxCUI
1791685
InChIKey
RKEWSXXUOLRFBX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Also called
Pimavanserina, Pimavanserine, PIMAVANSERIN TARTRATE, PIMAVANSERIN [MI], Pimavanserin [WHO-DD], pimavanserin [INN]
Development code
ACP-103
Trade name
Nuplazid
Sources (8)

Sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrials.gov ·
  • ClinicalTrials.gov ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 snapshot 2026-09-01T09:00:05 ·
  • this record's own fields 2,3,5 ·
  • Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov organism ladder ·
  • open-targets-adr CHEMBL2111101 ·
  • openfda-label 1e6bea44-57d6-4bac-9328-46e1ee59f83b ·
2 more sources

ChEMBL ATC CC BY-SA · ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · Open Targets 26.06 — CC0 · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work

How these records are assembled · Which registers were checked

Index-quality checks
  • identity passed: no open identity hold
  • required summary fields resolved: 5 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Most important common problem, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
  • public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
  • source coverage passed: 8 source rows
  • no critical contamination: no quarantine open
  • canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
  • no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.