Skip to content

Oxygen

  • Prescription medicine
  • Prescription only
  • Identity checked
  • Sources last checked 2026-09-04

This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.

What Oxygen does in the body

RNAWiki has not recorded what this substance changes in the body.

What happened in people

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

A fixed RNAWiki sentence

Where this came from

Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.

No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.

No source is stored against this line.

The limit that matters most

Not recorded.

Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

What the registries record it as

  • The supplement label database classes it as other, under the name Oxygen.

    NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · 1827 · read 2026-08-29

  • Its recorded molecular formula is O2, weighing 31.999.

    PubChem record · 977 · read 2026-08-29

Where each sentence above came from

No plain explanation of what this changes is stored.

No recorded use is stored in reader language.

No statement of the main limit is recorded.

The four opening statements run to 26 words.

Words this page uses

Four words worth knowing first

Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.

Stand-in result

A stand-in result is a number measured because the real result takes too long.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

It is like judging a journey by the speedometer rather than by arriving.

Where that stops being true. Speed does predict arrival. Many stand-in results do not predict the real one.

What people get wrong. A stand-in result is often reported as the result itself.

A surrogate endpoint substituted for a clinical endpoint, valid only where the substitution has been shown to hold.

Enzyme

An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.

Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.

What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.

A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.

Receptor

A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.

Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.

What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.

A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.

Pathway

A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A pathway is like a row of dominoes.

Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.

What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.

An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What was measured, goal by goal

One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.

Registered studies list 40 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.

There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.

Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
GoalLife outcomeWhat a body can doHow a person feelsA test resultA step in the bodyHarmsHow longWho was studied
PainNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Waiting for a reviewer6 registered symptom measure.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Body weightNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Only a number moved2 registered test measure.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
EnduranceNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Waiting for a reviewer1 registered performance measure of this kind.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Blood sugarNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Only a number moved1 registered test measure.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
CholesterolNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Only a number moved1 registered test measure.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Pain
pain during intravesical injection; vas pain from baseline to 3 month follow up; vas pain from baseline to before 2nd block; vas pain from baseline to before 3rd block; behavioral indicators of infant pain; nitrous oxide and chronic pain
Body weight
body weight; body composition
Endurance
6 minute walking distance
Blood sugar
effect of sucralose on insulin concentration
Cholesterol
triglycerides blood levels

Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.

What each mark on this table means
Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
Waiting for a reviewer
6 registered symptom measure.
Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.
Only a number moved
2 registered test measure.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What happened in people

Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.

Health Activation and Engagement (Non-Inferiority)

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT07669168
How many people
1000000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Mortality

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT04501458
How many people
200000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Proportion of children with a severe complication (death or secondary hospitalisation) by Day 7

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT04910750
How many people
167517
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

All Cause mortality at 30 days

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT03690128
How many people
150000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
Living longer, or avoiding a major event
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Number of participants who progress by at least one level higher on the PLATIPUS Ordinal Outcome Scale

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT06461429
How many people
100000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Number of Participants With First Episode of Confirmed Vaccine-type Community-acquired Pneumonia (VT-CAP)

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT00744263
How many people
84496
Study design
Phase 4
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Inhalation

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA Drugs@FDA · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How close this is to real life

The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.

  1. Living longer, or avoiding a major event Evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.2 registered measures of this kind. 2 written-up studies measured this and did not show a benefit.
  2. What a body can do day to day Evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.1 registered measure of this kind.
  3. Measured performance Evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.1 registered measure of this kind.
  4. Symptoms and quality of life Evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.6 registered measures of this kind.
  5. A number that stands in for health Evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.5 registered measures of this kind.
  6. A step measured inside a person Evidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.1 registered measure inside human tissue.
  7. Animals Evidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in C. elegans (roundworm), Mouse, Dog, Non-human primate. A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
  8. Cells in a dish Evidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
  9. A guess from software No evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.

Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Felt, measured, or meaningful

Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.

Felt

Things a person could notice without a test.

  • pain during intravesical injection
  • vas pain from baseline to 3 month follow up
  • vas pain from baseline to before 2nd block
  • vas pain from baseline to before 3rd block
  • behavioral indicators of infant pain
  • nitrous oxide and chronic pain

Measured

Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.

  • body weight
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • urine osmolality
  • body composition
  • effect of sucralose on insulin concentration
  • triglycerides blood levels

Meaningful

Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.

  • 6 minute walking distance
  • bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death
  • death

A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.

Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.

Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.

Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.

Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.

Names that fit none of the three (25)
  • eczema area and severity index scores according to location
  • dyspnea
  • exercise tolerance
  • surgical wound infection
  • length of stay
  • neurodevelopment
  • panss
  • core temperature
  • visual analogue scale
  • spirometry
  • gastrointestinal peptide secretion
  • gingival index
  • eibi bleeding eastman indterdental bleeding index scale
  • plaque index
  • time to first bowel movement
  • rate of postoperative complications
  • circulating angiogenic cells
  • eczema area and severity index
  • neurodevelopmental outcome
  • blood sugar

These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Were people like you studied?

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.

Who was studied

People similar to this profile were included.

  • Mixed drink

Who is missing from the studies

  • Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

Where the result stopped carrying

  • This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
  • It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Why it might seem to do nothing

A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.

It was studied for a different goal

The studies measured something else entirely.

On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.

It was studied in different people

The people in the studies were not much like the reader.

On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

The evidence may simply be wrong

Small early studies often do not hold up.

On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.

None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What taking it involves

The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.

How it is supplied

Prescription only

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

Read from the recorded approval status.

No source is stored against this line.

Form and route

Inhalation

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form and route recorded on this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

Who oversees it

RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

No register row and no identity class settled the question.

No source is stored against this line.

What is in the pack

Sold as gas, liquid, inhalant, given by the inhalation, respiratory (inhalation), oral route.

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.

No source is stored against this line.

Where it is registered

Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.

Counted from records

Where this came from

A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.

Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.

No source is stored against this line.

Why people stop

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

What it would be like to takeNothing found in the sources checked

What can go wrong

Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Reports sent to a regulator

  • These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction.
  • Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing.
  • The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete.
  • News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report.
  • A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Oxygen appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 10 most-reported reaction terms, 312 reaction mentions were counted. One report can name several reactions.

The recorded terms (10)
  • dyspnoea — 56 reaction mentions
  • thermal burn — 53 reaction mentions
  • retinopathy of prematurity — 39 reaction mentions
  • premature baby — 30 reaction mentions
  • oxygen saturation decreased — 28 reaction mentions
  • epistaxis — 27 reaction mentions
  • accident — 26 reaction mentions
  • hypoxia — 21 reaction mentions
  • tachypnoea — 17 reaction mentions
  • hypercapnia — 15 reaction mentions
  • open-targets-adr · recorded 2026-06-24 · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.

Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Does the exact form matter?

Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.

The form that was studied

Inhalation

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form used in the studies cited on this page.

No source is stored against this line.

What is sold

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.

No source is stored against this line.

What is recorded as being sold

  • 610 products list this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. 570 of them contain it and nothing else.

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 71654-005 · read 2026-08-29

  • They are sold as gas, inhalant and liquid, taken cutaneous, nasal, oral and respiratory (inhalation).

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 71654-005 · read 2026-08-29

  • 592 published labels name it as an active ingredient. 551 of them describe this substance alone, which is where its own label text on this page comes from.

    US prescribing information · 4e5df6ce-06ef-498f-b064-b2b6e1521951 · read 2026-08-29

  • Those labels are classed as human otc drug and human prescription drug.

    US prescribing information · 4e5df6ce-06ef-498f-b064-b2b6e1521951 · read 2026-08-29

  • 1185 marketed supplement labels list this ingredient, classed as botanical with nutrients, mineral, non-nutrient/non-botanical and other combinations.

    NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · 19735 · read 2026-08-29

  • Those labels carry all other, nutrient and structure/function claims. A claim of that kind is written by the manufacturer and is not assessed by any regulator, so its presence says nothing about whether it is true.

    NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · 19735 · read 2026-08-29

Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What you could measure

This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.

RNAWiki could not confidently classify this substance, so no self-experiment plan is offered.

Questions worth asking

  • Which of the trials of Oxygen studied people like me?
  • What was measured, and for how long?
  • Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
  • What would we watch for, and when would we stop?

Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.

RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What nobody knows yet

Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.

How fast does the body clear it?

The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.

Why it matters. Without this, nothing on this page can say how long anything lasts.

What would answer it

A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing populations

Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing long-term data

No completed tested study window is recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

No reviewed conclusion

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing interaction studies

No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Formulation uncertainty

Several salts, forms or products of Oxygen are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Mechanism not reviewed

No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

What happened in peopleNothing found in the sources checked

Check any of this yourself

Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No traced study record is stored for this substance.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Checks this page had to pass

  • Passed

    Identity resolved

    no open identity hold

  • Passed

    No unresolved merge across substance families

    no quarantine open

  • Not passed

    Every public sentence names a source

    The opening statement carries no source: the record holds neither an explanation nor a recorded use.

  • Not passed

    Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence

    No registered study is classified as testing this substance.

  • Passed

    No internal keys in reader text

    enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

  • Not passed

    Safety mode resolved

    No register row and no identity class settled the question.

  • Passed

    Canonical metadata present

    slug and display name present

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How this medicine reached us

Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.

What the approval register records

  • 20 approved applications cover products containing this substance. The earliest was NDA205713, approved 20130616 to AIR LIQUID INDUSTRIAL US LP.

    Drugs@FDA application register · NDA205713 · read 2026-08-29

  • Marketing status on the register: prescription.

    Drugs@FDA application register · NDA205713 · read 2026-08-29

  • The earliest marketing start date recorded for a listed product is 19381020.

    FDA National Drug Code directory · 71654-005 · read 2026-08-29

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What to learn next

Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.

This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.

What is not here

6 questions this page could not answer

These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.

  • The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.

The record as stored

The full record, for auditing

Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.

Recorded evidence blocks (15)

What did Oxygen's largest trial (120000 people) and its longest (32 years) measure?


120000 people in Oxygen's largest registered study, 32 years in its longest registered window, measuring Mortality in ICU. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

289 na, 50 phase2, 50 phase4, 42 phase3, 36 phase1, 16 na or unstated, 8 early phase1; NCT01181869; 2015-01. Last human test completed 2026, NCT07507344.

Interpretation These counts include studies where Oxygen was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.

Show the evidence
  • na
    289
  • phase2
    50
  • phase4
    50
  • phase3
    42
  • phase1
    36
  • na or unstated
    16
2 more recorded rows
  • early phase1
    8
  • Last recorded human test NCT07507344
    2026-07-23

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

From C. elegans to human: where has Oxygen shown lifespan?


C. elegans: lifespan, NHP: lifespan, mouse: mechanism-only, dog: mechanism-only and human: lifespan (468): the rungs where Oxygen has a recorded finding. Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov · organism ladder · 2026-09-01

Interpretation Mortality in ICU — the recorded outcome words.

Yeast C. elegans lifespanDrosophila Mouse mechanism-onlyRat Dog mechanism-onlyNon-human primate lifespanHuman lifespan
Show the evidence
  • C. elegans
    lifespan
  • NHP
    lifespan
  • mouse
    mechanism-only
  • dog
    mechanism-only
  • human NCT01319643
    lifespan; Mortality in ICU; 468

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

36 of Oxygen's trials stopped: futility/efficacy, accrual/recruitment, funding/business, other?


futility/efficacy (1), accrual/recruitment (18), funding/business (2) and other (15): Oxygen's stop wording, clustered. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

"slow enrollment"; 36 of 468 registered studies

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT00041548
    terminated; "slow enrollment"
  • NCT00142051
    terminated; "18 or 20 enrolled, stopped due to paucity of available participants"
  • NCT00410150
    terminated; "Study was stopped after interim analysis and slow enrollment."
  • NCT00515281
    terminated; "The pace of patient enrolledment forced recruitment to stop after 273 patients."
  • NCT00863603
    terminated; "Clinical changes: graft to fistula first; enrollment of 46/132 planned. NIH approved animal model: supplemental oxygen/AV fistula."
  • NCT00982241
    withdrawn; "Difficulty in enrolling participants"
14 further recorded trials
  • NCT01261377
    withdrawn; "the fellow interested in this project left the institution"
  • NCT01286220
    terminated; "the study was terminated due to participant drop out"
  • NCT01298921
    terminated; "PI left Geisinger-study terminated prematurely - 4 patients enrolled"
  • NCT01622322
    withdrawn; "no enrollment"
  • NCT01799161
    withdrawn; "Insufficient funding"
  • NCT02241798
    terminated; "Investigator is leaving the institution and has terminated the study."
  • NCT02356900
    terminated; "Lack of funding required to enroll target subject number"
  • NCT02703233
    withdrawn; "Feasibility"
  • NCT03015051
    terminated; "Difficulty in recruiting subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria"
  • NCT03093090
    withdrawn; "Study never officially began"
  • NCT03102827
    terminated; "Unavailability of PI and Deputy"
  • NCT03127371
    terminated; "Low enrollment rate"
  • NCT03660657
    terminated; "Very low recruitment. During COVID-19 pandemic these are patients of high risk."
  • NCT03716193
    terminated; "Terminated March 22, 2022 due to COVID-19 pandemic"

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Human studies of Oxygen used Oxygen (>90% by hood) - standard therapy — over how long?


Human studies of Oxygen used "Oxygen (>90% by hood) - standard therapy". ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

14 recorded entries; human; also "water~100mL", "100% oxygen", "subanesthetic sevoflurane in 60% oxygen"

Show the evidence

human

  • NCT00732537
    Oxygen (>90% by hood) - standard therapy
  • NCT02173964
    water~100mL
  • NCT02185118
    100% oxygen
  • NCT02185118
    subanesthetic sevoflurane in 60% oxygen
  • NCT02185118
    subanesthetic isoflurane in 60% oxygen
  • NCT03182543
    200 g mango pulp + 600 mL water
8 more recorded rows
  • human NCT03182543
    160 g mango pulp + 40 g mango peel + 600 mL water
  • human NCT03182543
    600 mL water
  • human NCT03513393
    water 250ml
  • human NCT03879538
    50 % Nitrous Oxide plus 50% Oxygen
  • human NCT03879538
    50% Oxygen
  • human NCT05726344
    Water 600 mL
  • human NCT06457399
    Oxygen 31%
  • human NCT06665633
    Oxygen 100 % Gas for Inhalation

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Did Oxygen move epigenetic age, and by how much?


epigenetic age: "Though the mechanisms behind these findings are not well-defined, the association between postnatal measures of oxygen saturation and epigenetic age suggests hypoxia may play a significant role and should be explored in future studies." Europe PMC · epigenetic clock search · 2025-07-28

2 recorded sentences; 2025, 2006; biomarker

Show the evidence
  • epigenetic age PMID 40722095
    2025; "Though the mechanisms behind these findings are not well-defined, the association between postnatal measures of oxygen saturation and epigenetic age suggests hypoxia may play a significant role and should be explored in future studies."
  • Horvath PMID 16875416
    2006; "Synthesis of thylakoid (=photosynthetic apparatus) is thought to occur during mid-cell cycle and coincides with a period of peak phospholipid synthesis and oxygen production (Csatorday and Horvath, 1977; Asato, 1979)."

recorded 2025-07-28 · last checked 2026-09-04

More Oxygen was worse in human: at what point?


Hormetic in human: "Pharmacological scavenging of reactive oxygen species abolished Akt phosphorylation and reduced the protective effects of preconditioning, supporting a hormetic signaling model rather than direct antioxidant action." Europe PMC · dose-response search · 2026-03-30

5 recorded sentences naming Oxygen; hormetic, hormesis

Show the evidence
  • hormetic PMID 42072074
    "Pharmacological scavenging of reactive oxygen species abolished Akt phosphorylation and reduced the protective effects of preconditioning, supporting a hormetic signaling model rather than direct antioxidant action."
  • hormesis
    "Moreover, reactive oxygen species-mediated stress priming and memory facilitated by chromatin dynamics and epigenetic regulation have been proposed as key mechanisms of radiation hormesis."
  • hormetic PMID 39580755
    "A double-edged sword, bioflavonoids' antioxidant or prooxidant properties contribute to their hormetic behavior and facilitate redox homeostasis by regulating the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells."
  • hormesis PMID 40084522
    "There are an array of abiotic and biotic agents that have been shown to trigger hormesis; most commonly studied are chemicals, temperature, and low oxygen."
  • hormetic PMID 40084522
    "Investigations into low-oxygen exposures that activate the hormetic response reveal that insect performance can be dramatically improved by single short low-oxygen events, but the focus of this work has been primarily on short-term, transitory protection afforded by hormesis."

recorded 2026-03-30 · last checked 2026-09-04

Could one person measure Oxygen's effect on eczema area and severity index scores according to location?


Eczema area and severity index scores according to location: measured in Oxygen's trials.

Interpretation eczema area and severity index scores according to location is the recorded endpoint.

Show the evidence

biomarkers

  • eczema area and severity index scores according to location; 2026-09-01
  • dyspnea; 2026-09-01
  • exercise tolerance; 2026-09-01
  • surgical wound infection; 2026-09-01
  • 6 minute walking distance; 2026-09-01
  • length of stay; 2026-09-01
14 more recorded rows
  • biomarkers
    neurodevelopment; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    panss; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    core temperature; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    visual analogue scale; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    body weight; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    magnetic resonance imaging; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    spirometry; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    pain during intravesical injection; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    gastrointestinal peptide secretion; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    urine osmolality; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    gingival index; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    eibi bleeding eastman indterdental bleeding index scale; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    plaque index; 2026-09-01
  • human trials at or under30
    186
  • Not recorded for this substance
    a recorded half-life
  • smallest human trial
    0; NCT00982241; NA; the smallest recorded human enrolment at or below 30; the registry states no direction of its result; WITHDRAWN

Which of 6 minute walking distance, behavioral indicators of infant pain and blood sugar did Oxygen's trials measure?


6 minute walking distance, behavioral indicators of infant pain and blood sugar lead 40 outcome terms across Oxygen's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

surgical wound infection, 6 minute walking distance, length of stay, neurodevelopment, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death and panss follow.

Show the evidence
  • eczema area and severity index scores according to location
    1
  • dyspnea
    1
  • exercise tolerance
    1
  • surgical wound infection
    1
  • 6 minute walking distance
    1
  • length of stay
    1
14 more recorded rows
  • neurodevelopment
    1
  • bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death
    1
  • panss
    1
  • core temperature
    1
  • visual analogue scale
    1
  • body weight
    1
  • magnetic resonance imaging
    1
  • spirometry
    1
  • pain during intravesical injection
    1
  • gastrointestinal peptide secretion
    1
  • urine osmolality
    1
  • gingival index
    1
  • eibi bleeding eastman indterdental bleeding index scale
    1
  • plaque index
    1

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which of Oxygen's 52 ongoing trials reports first?


52 registered trials of Oxygen are open; earliest completion 2025-06-30. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

change in total vascular resistance; BOLD MRI signal change during maternal oxygen exposure in placenta and fetus; latest 2030-06-30

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT00581321
    "Oral Water Ingestion in Heart Transplant Patients"; n 40; "change in total vascular resistance"; 2029-12
  • NCT02297724
    "MRI Assessment of Placental Health"; n 80; "BOLD MRI signal change during maternal oxygen exposure in placenta and fetus"; 2028-09
  • NCT02965638
    "Trial of Maternal Oxygen for Fetal Left Heart Hypoplasia"; n 12; "Fetal aortic valve growth"; 2027-07
  • NCT03380195
    "Effects of Watermelon Juice on Heart Rate Recovery and Post-exercise Muscle Soreness"; n 27; "Change of heart rate after submax exercise"; 2028-12
  • NCT03552627
    "Perioperative UtiLisation of SupplEmental Oxygen"; n 28; "Total Free Thiols"; 2026-12
  • NCT04216927
    "NO During CPB in Neonates to Reduce Risk of AKI"; n 40; "AKI"; 2027-06-30
14 further recorded trials
  • NCT04229043
    "Gastric Emptying of Water and Sports Drink in Labor"; n 108; "Gastric emptying half time"; 2027-12-31
  • NCT04256798
    "Perioperative Respiratory Care and Outcomes for Patients Undergoing High Risk Abdominal Surgery"; n 12942; "Number of participants with pneumonia using the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definition of pneumonia (Mouthwash intervention only)"; 2026-06-01
  • NCT04299893
    "Ozone Therapy in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: RCT (O3NPIQ)"; n 42; "Change from Baseline in "Average pain" according to the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) (at the end of ozone therapy)"; 2027-12-31
  • NCT04307615
    "O2 Versus CPAP Treatment of Patients Undergoing SIPE Therapy (OCTOPUS)"; n 90; "Absolute peripheral oxygen saturation (%) after treatment"; 2027-07-15
  • NCT04808401
    "Influence of Oxygen on Perioperative Outcome in Patients Undergoing General Anaesthesia for Elective Non-cardiac Surgery"; n 110; "Difference in hsTnT from preoperative baseline"; 2028-12
  • NCT04876742
    "Wheat Beer for Prevention of Delirium in Intensive Care Patients"; n 380; "Development of delirium"; 2029-12-31
  • NCT04966299
    "Effect of Daily Erythritol Versus Sucrose Intake Over 5 Weeks on Glucose Tolerance in Adolescents"; n 30; "Insulin resistance"; 2026-07
  • NCT05185115
    "Efficacy of Nasal Oxygen Therapy to Reduce Postoperative Complications in Ankle Trauma Surgery in At-risk Patients: a Randomized Pilot Study."; n 200; "Cutaneous and infectious complications"; 2026-10-01
  • NCT05412810
    "Oxidative Lipidomic Biomarkers During Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients (OXY-BAL)."; n 200; "Oxidized n6-PUFAs (Poly Unsaturated Fatty Acids)"; 2026-09-01
  • NCT05484739
    "Heat Waves and the Elderly - Cooling Modalities"; n 100; "Change in core body temperature"; 2026-08-31
  • NCT05589753
    "Sleep Disordered Breathing With Opioid Use"; n 150; "Apneic threshold - a measure of breathing instability"; 2027-03-31
  • NCT06028659
    "Investigation of in Vivo Endogenous and/or Exogenous Production of Phenolic Metabolites Using (un)Targeted Metabolomics"; n 30; "Number and concentration of phenolic metabolites in urine"; 2025-06-30
  • NCT06043440
    "Down Syndrome Obstructive Sleep Apnea"; n 230; "Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2 (BRIEF2) working memory score"; 2027-12-30
  • NCT06155708
    "Exogenous Ketone Supplementation in Females with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome"; n 60; "Glycemic responses to a 2-hr oral glucose tolerance test"; 2027-12

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which running trial of Oxygen could settle insulin sensitivity?


NCT07545538 measures Insulin Resistance, reading out 2026-06-01.

3 open trials; n 50; "Carbohydrate Loading in Lowering Perioperative Insulin Resistance in Pediatric Surgery"

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT07545538
    "Carbohydrate Loading in Lowering Perioperative Insulin Resistance in Pediatric Surgery"; n 50; "Insulin Resistance"; 2026-06-01
  • NCT04966299
    "Effect of Daily Erythritol Versus Sucrose Intake Over 5 Weeks on Glucose Tolerance in Adolescents"; n 30; "Insulin resistance"; 2026-07
  • NCT06155708
    "Exogenous Ketone Supplementation in Females with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome"; n 60; "Glycemic responses to a 2-hr oral glucose tolerance test"; 2027-12

Which 239 trials of Oxygen posted no result?


Posted no result
239 of 239 completed trials
Registrations
NCT00955643, NCT00635947, NCT00732537, NCT00546299, NCT00394225 and NCT00249093, and 233 more
Completion dates
oldest 2003-04; newest 2024-08-15
Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT00955643
    2003-04
  • NCT00635947
    2005-01
  • NCT00732537
    2005-06
  • NCT00546299
    2005-12
  • NCT00394225
    2006-05
  • NCT00249093
    2007-04
14 further recorded trials
  • NCT00327873
    2008-03
  • NCT00670891
    2008-04
  • NCT00637936
    2008-08
  • NCT00776971
    2008-09
  • NCT00364741
    2008-11
  • NCT00922350
    2008-12
  • NCT00978900
    2009-07
  • NCT01042262
    2009-08
  • NCT01784146
    2009-11
  • NCT01268462
    2010-01
  • NCT00785200
    2010-02
  • NCT01088841
    2010-03
  • NCT00623220
    2010-04
  • NCT01019538
    2010-04

At the median, Oxygen's trials enrolled 42 people — anything larger?


Median enrolment
42
Largest enrolment
120000
Registered trials counted
467

What do 312 spontaneous reports say about Oxygen — and not say?


These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction. Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing. The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete. News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report. A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Oxygen appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 10 most-reported reaction terms, 312 reaction mentions were counted: dyspnoea 56; thermal burn 53; retinopathy of prematurity 39; premature baby 30. open-targets-adr · CHEMBL1234886 · 2026-06-24

Show the evidence
  • dyspnoea
    56
  • thermal burn
    53
  • retinopathy of prematurity
    39
  • premature baby
    30
  • oxygen saturation decreased
    28
  • epistaxis
    27
4 more recorded rows
  • accident
    26
  • hypoxia
    21
  • tachypnoea
    17
  • hypercapnia
    15

recorded 2026-06-24 · last checked 2026-09-04

Was Oxygen studied with exercise?


exercise is named in Oxygen's label sentences: "The trial is powered to detect between-group differences in four co-primary endpoints: (1) left ventricular mass (g) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, (2) peak oxygen consumption (mL·kg⁻<sup>1</sup>·min⁻<sup>1</sup>) by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, (3) appendicular lean mass (g) by…" openfda-label+europepmc · 2025-10-30

1 recorded statement; exercise

Show the evidence
  • exercise
    The trial is powered to detect between-group differences in four co-primary endpoints: (1) left ventricular mass (g) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, (2) peak oxygen consumption (mL·kg⁻<sup>1</sup>·min⁻<sup>1</sup>) by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, (3) appendicular lean mass (g) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and (4) high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L).

recorded 2025-10-30 · last checked 2026-09-04

What is recorded about Oxygen and mTOR?


"AMPK further shapes reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated necroptotic responses through downstream effectors, including mTOR and Nrf2." — where Oxygen and mTOR appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2026-09-01

mTOR, AMPK, sirtuin, autophagy, NAD+; PMID 42584540, 42584557, 41436543, 42157427

Show the evidence
  • mTOR PMID 42584540
    "AMPK further shapes reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated necroptotic responses through downstream effectors, including mTOR and Nrf2."

AMPK

  • PMID 42584540
    "AMPK further shapes reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated necroptotic responses through downstream effectors, including mTOR and Nrf2."
  • PMID 42584557
    "Nuclear SIRT1 coordinates AMPK-FOXO3-Nrf2 signaling to upregulate antioxidant enzymes and maintain mitophagic balance; mitochondrial SIRT3 dominates PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy and deacetylates SOD2 to eliminate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species; cytoplasmic SIRT2 alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress and restrains NLRP3 inflammasome activation; mitochondrial SIRT4 and SIRT5 stabilize…"
  • sirtuin PMID 42584557
    "Nuclear SIRT1 coordinates AMPK-FOXO3-Nrf2 signaling to upregulate antioxidant enzymes and maintain mitophagic balance; mitochondrial SIRT3 dominates PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy and deacetylates SOD2 to eliminate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species; cytoplasmic SIRT2 alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress and restrains NLRP3 inflammasome activation; mitochondrial SIRT4 and SIRT5 stabilize…"
  • mTOR PMID 41436543
    "Additionally, this study showed that targeting TRAF3IP2 disrupts cellular energetics by affecting AMPK/LKB1 and mTOR signaling pathways and increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, ultimately leading to reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis."
  • AMPK PMID 41436543
    "Additionally, this study showed that targeting TRAF3IP2 disrupts cellular energetics by affecting AMPK/LKB1 and mTOR signaling pathways and increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, ultimately leading to reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis."
  • mTOR PMID 42157427
    "In conclusion, these results indicated that FGF21 could restore ASC viability by upregulating TFE3-mediated autophagy flux in part through the FGFR1-SIRT1-MTOR signaling pathway, enhanced the potential to improve the differentiation of ASCs into neural stem cells and enhanced the therapeutic effect of ASCs transplantation in acute ICH.<b>Abbreviations</b>: FGF21: fibroblast growth factor 21;…"
  • sirtuin PMID 42157427
    "In conclusion, these results indicated that FGF21 could restore ASC viability by upregulating TFE3-mediated autophagy flux in part through the FGFR1-SIRT1-MTOR signaling pathway, enhanced the potential to improve the differentiation of ASCs into neural stem cells and enhanced the therapeutic effect of ASCs transplantation in acute ICH.<b>Abbreviations</b>: FGF21: fibroblast growth factor 21;…"
  • autophagy PMID 42157427
    "In conclusion, these results indicated that FGF21 could restore ASC viability by upregulating TFE3-mediated autophagy flux in part through the FGFR1-SIRT1-MTOR signaling pathway, enhanced the potential to improve the differentiation of ASCs into neural stem cells and enhanced the therapeutic effect of ASCs transplantation in acute ICH.<b>Abbreviations</b>: FGF21: fibroblast growth factor 21;…"
2 more recorded rows
  • NAD+ PMID 42478712
    "NAMPT inhibition reduced the oxygen-consuming capacity of HR-MDS HSPCs compared with healthy controls."
  • sirtuin PMID 42390583
    "Specifically, it concurrently suppresses pro-fibrotic pathways including TGF-β1/Smad, Wnt/β-catenin, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR to attenuate extracellular matrix deposition and myofibroblast activation; activates the Nrf2-Keap1 antioxidant axis and the AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α energy metabolism pathway to enhance mitochondrial biogenesis and scavenge reactive oxygen species; and blocks p38/JNK and NF-κB…"

autophagy

  • "Furthermore, the AMPK activator AICAR and the mTOR inhibitor Rapamycin enhanced the MYG1-mediated effects, as evidenced by increased oxygen consumption rate, decreased extracellular acidification rate, and improved mitochondrial autophagy and ultrastructural repair."
  • PMID 41758775
    "In LPS-treated Caco-2 cells, RE inhibited inflammation, promoted autophagy, and suppressed reactive oxygen species production."

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Where it is registered
Identifiers, relations and other names

The exact record

ChEMBL id
CHEMBL1234886
PubChem CID
977
CAS number
7782-44-7
RxCUI
7806
InChIKey
MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Also called
Dioxygen, E948, Molecular oxygen, Oxygen 93 percent, Oxygenium, Oxygen molecule, atmospheric oxygen, equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide, hbo, hbo2, hbot, hfno
Development code
E-948, INS-948, INS NO.948, OXYGEN COMPONENT OF RNS-60, OXYGEN COMPONENT OF RNS60
Trade name
Medicinal oxygen air liquide sante, Oxygen-Nitrogen Mixture, Oxygen Compressed Gas, Oxygen-Helium Mixture, Air Compressed, Reconstituted Air, NINA WATER (Rich anions), Air / Oxygen-Nitrogen Mixture / Oxygen Compressed Gas / Oxygen-Helium Mixture / Air Compressed / Reconstituted Air
Salt form
WATER
Sources (11)

Sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrials.gov ·
  • ClinicalTrials.gov ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 snapshot 2026-09-01T09:00:05 ·
  • this record's own fields 2,3,5 ·
  • Europe PMC dose-response search ·
  • Europe PMC epigenetic clock search ·
  • Europe PMC pathway abstract search ·
5 more sources

ChEMBL ATC CC BY-SA · ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · Open Targets 26.06 — CC0 · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work

How these records are assembled · Which registers were checked

Index-quality checks
  • identity passed: no open identity hold
  • required summary fields resolved: 5 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Most important common problem, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
  • public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
  • source coverage passed: 11 source rows
  • no critical contamination: no quarantine open
  • canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
  • no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.