This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.
What Orange Juice does in the body
RNAWiki has not recorded what this substance changes in the body.
From the FDA-approved label: Vitamins and minerals are absorbed and metabolized through normal biological pathways, contributing to various physiological functions. The botanical extracts provide additional support for energy levels and overall well-being.
What happened in people
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
§ A fixed RNAWiki sentence
Where this came from
Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.
No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.
No source is stored against this line.
The limit that matters most
Not recorded.
Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.
What the registries record it as
The substance registry classes this as structurallydiverse.
FDA substance registry · 5A9KE2L9L3 · read 2026-08-29
It is recorded as coming from Citrus x sinensis whole. The part recorded is fruit.
FDA substance registry · 5A9KE2L9L3 · read 2026-08-29
The supplement label database classes it as botanical, under the name Sweet Orange.
No recorded sentence describes the change this makes in a way that stands on its own.
No recorded use is stored in reader language.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 56 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Stand-in result
A stand-in result is a number measured because the real result takes too long.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
It is like judging a journey by the speedometer rather than by arriving.
Where that stops being true. Speed does predict arrival. Many stand-in results do not predict the real one.
What people get wrong. A stand-in result is often reported as the result itself.
A surrogate endpoint substituted for a clinical endpoint, valid only where the substitution has been shown to hold.
Enzyme
An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.
Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.
What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.
A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.
Receptor
A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.
Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.
What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.
A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.
Pathway
A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A pathway is like a row of dominoes.
Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.
What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.
An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What was measured, goal by goal
One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.
Registered studies list 20 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.
There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.
Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
Goal
Life outcome
What a body can do
How a person feels
A test result
A step in the body
Harms
How long
Who was studied
Cholesterol
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved3 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Blood sugar
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved2 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Body weight
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved1 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Cholesterol
24 hour triglyceride area under the curve; total cholesterol; ldl c
Blood sugar
insulin sensitivity; rest of day blood glucose concentrations
Body weight
body weight
Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.
What each mark on this table means
∅ Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
△ Only a number moved
3 registered test measure.
— Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.
… Waiting for a reviewer
Who was studied is listed further down the page.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What happened in people
Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.
Targeted fruit and vegetable (TFV) intake
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT02651064
How many people
55095
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Safety Profile of Deferasirox Based Upon Drug Administration and Reporting of Serious Adverse Events
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT00235391
How many people
1683
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Hemoglobin difference
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT06366698
How many people
900
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Change in BMI z Score
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT02124460
How many people
721
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Serum Levels of 25hydroxy Vitamin D(25(OH)D)Compared to the Due Control Group
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT00864539
How many people
585
Study design
Phase 2/Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Number of Days With at Least Moderate (i.e. Moderate or Severe) Common Cold Symptoms.
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT00778648
How many people
543
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Oral
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
□Living longer, or avoiding a major eventNo evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.No registered study measures this.
□What a body can do day to dayNo evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
□Measured performanceNo evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
□Symptoms and quality of lifeNo evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.No registered study measures this.
■A number that stands in for healthEvidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.8 registered measures of this kind.
■A step measured inside a personEvidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
■AnimalsEvidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in Drosophila (fruit fly). A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
■Cells in a dishEvidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
□A guess from softwareNo evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Felt, measured, or meaningful
Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.
Felt
Things a person could notice without a test.
No registered study measured anything of this kind.
Measured
Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.
insulin sensitivity
flow mediated dilation
plasma nitrite concentration
24 hour triglyceride area under the curve
body weight
total cholesterol
ldl c
rest of day blood glucose concentrations
Meaningful
Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.
No registered study measured anything of this kind.
A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.
Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.
Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.
Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.
Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.
Names that fit none of the three (12)
explicit food wanting
implicit food wanting for different food categories
explicit food wanting for different food categories
explicit food liking for different food categories
categorical
food intake
gastric antral area
stool frequency
endothelial function
glycemic response
ad libitum food intake
glycemic index
These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
People similar to this profile were included.
Boostervite™ contains a combination of vitamins, minerals, and botanical extracts intended to supplement nutritional intake in patients with low energy associated with nutritional needs, under the supervision of a healthcare provider.
Who is missing from the studies
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Where the result stopped carrying
This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely.
On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.
It was studied in different people
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
The evidence may simply be wrong
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Prescription only
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Oral
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form and route recorded on this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
No register row and no identity class settled the question.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Sold as tablet, given by the oral route.
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
# Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to take∅Nothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
∅Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Oral
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form used in the studies cited on this page.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
1 product lists this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. None of them contains it on its own, so nothing on this page can separate it from what it is combined with.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 59088-022 · read 2026-08-29
They are sold as tablet, taken oral.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 59088-022 · read 2026-08-29
1 published label names it as an active ingredient. None of them describes this substance alone, so no label text on this page can be attributed to it rather than to a combination.
US prescribing information · 53efbf65-8844-8486-e063-6394a90a51d3 · read 2026-08-29
Those labels are classed as human prescription drug.
US prescribing information · 53efbf65-8844-8486-e063-6394a90a51d3 · read 2026-08-29
16679 marketed supplement labels list this ingredient, classed as botanical and other combinations.
Those labels carry all other, nutrient and structure/function claims. A claim of that kind is written by the manufacturer and is not assessed by any regulator, so its presence says nothing about whether it is true.
Boostervite is oral at HOW SUPPLIED: Boostervite™ tablets are yellow to brown, speckled, film-coated tablets, supplied in bottles of 30 tablets (NDC 59088-022-54)., recorded as fda label in effect 2026-06-18 in the United States.
US prescribing information · 53efbf65-8844-8486-e063-6394a90a51d3 · read 2026-08-30
Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What you could measure
This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.
RNAWiki could not confidently classify this substance, so no self-experiment plan is offered.
Questions worth asking
Which of the trials of Orange Juice studied people like me?
What was measured, and for how long?
Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
What would we watch for, and when would we stop?
Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.
RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What nobody knows yet
Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.
How fast does the body clear it?
The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.
Why it matters. Without this, nothing on this page can say how long anything lasts.
What would answer it
A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing populations
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing long-term data
No completed tested study window is recorded.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
No reviewed conclusion
RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Missing interaction studies
No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Formulation uncertainty
Several salts, forms or products of Orange Juice are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
Mechanism not reviewed
No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.
Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.
What would answer it
A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.
Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Check any of this yourself
Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.
Where else this substance is registered
FDA substance identifier (UNII)
5A9KE2L9L3
RxNorm concept
1358966
EMA substance identifier
100000170844
Checks this page had to pass
✓ Passed
Identity resolved
no open identity hold
✓ Passed
No unresolved merge across substance families
no quarantine open
✗ Not passed
Every public sentence names a source
The opening statement carries no source: the record holds neither an explanation nor a recorded use.
✗ Not passed
Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence
No registered study is classified as testing this substance.
✓ Passed
No internal keys in reader text
enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
✗ Not passed
Safety mode resolved
No register row and no identity class settled the question.
✓ Passed
Canonical metadata present
slug and display name present
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How this medicine reached us
Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.
What the approval register records
The earliest marketing start date recorded for a listed product is 20260619.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 59088-022 · read 2026-08-29
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What to learn next
Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
6 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
Recorded evidence blocks (9)
Q1
What did Orange Juice's largest trial (180 people) and its longest (14 years) measure?
180 people in Orange Juice's largest registered study, 14 years in its longest registered window, measuring Area under the concentration vs. time curve for the serum concentration of montelukast when coingested with grapefruit juice, orange juice, or Gatorade. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
31 na, 2 phase1, 2 phase2, 1 early phase1, 1 phase3, 1 phase4; NCT00559819; 2022-07; no ageing endpoint recorded. Last human test completed 2025, NCT04861623.
Interpretation These counts include studies where Orange Juice was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.
Show the evidence
na
31
phase1
2
phase2
2
early phase1
1
phase3
1
phase4
1
1 more recorded row
Last recorded human testNCT04861623
2025-10-31
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q2
From Drosophila to human: where has Orange Juice shown lifespan?
Interpretation Area under the concentration vs. time curve for the serum concentration of montelukast when coingested with grapefruit juice, orange juice, or Gatorade. — the recorded outcome words.
Show the evidence
Drosophila
lifespan
humanNCT00513760
biomarker; Area under the concentration vs. time curve for the serum concentration of montelukast when coingested with grapefruit juice, orange juice, or Gatorade.; 37
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q3
Human studies of Orange Juice used Orange juice (500 mL/d) — over how long?
4 recorded entries; human; also "Orange Juice (500 mL/d)", "Orange juice with either 6g or 3 g of β-Glucan", "300ml Orange Juice"
Show the evidence
human
NCT02914249
Orange juice (500 mL/d)
NCT03301675
Orange Juice (500 mL/d)
NCT04867655
Orange juice with either 6g or 3 g of β-Glucan
NCT06430138
300ml Orange Juice
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q4
Could one person measure Orange Juice's effect on insulin sensitivity?
Insulin sensitivity: measured in Orange Juice's trials.
Interpretation insulin sensitivity is the recorded endpoint.
Show the evidence
biomarkers
insulin sensitivity; 2026-09-01
explicit food wanting; 2026-09-01
implicit food wanting for different food categories; 2026-09-01
explicit food wanting for different food categories; 2026-09-01
explicit food liking for different food categories; 2026-09-01
flow mediated dilation; 2026-09-01
14 more recorded rows
biomarkers
plasma nitrite concentration; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
24 hour triglyceride area under the curve; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
body weight; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
total cholesterol; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
categorical; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
food intake; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
gastric antral area; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
ldl c; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
stool frequency; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
endothelial function; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
glycemic response; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
rest of day blood glucose concentrations; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
ad libitum food intake; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
glycemic index; 2026-09-01
human trials at or under30
20
Not recorded for this substance
a recorded half-life
smallest human trial
6; NCT01102062; NA; the smallest recorded human enrolment at or below 30; the registry states no direction of its result; COMPLETED
Q5
Which of 24 hour triglyceride area under the curve, ad libitum food intake and body weight did Orange Juice's trials measure?
24 hour triglyceride area under the curve, ad libitum food intake and body weight lead 20 outcome terms across Orange Juice's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
explicit food wanting for different food categories, explicit food liking for different food categories, flow mediated dilation, plasma nitrite concentration, 24 hour triglyceride area under the curve and body weight follow.
Show the evidence
insulin sensitivity
1
explicit food wanting
1
implicit food wanting for different food categories
1
explicit food wanting for different food categories
1
explicit food liking for different food categories
1
flow mediated dilation
1
14 more recorded rows
plasma nitrite concentration
1
24 hour triglyceride area under the curve
1
body weight
1
total cholesterol
1
categorical
1
food intake
1
gastric antral area
1
ldl c
1
stool frequency
1
endothelial function
1
glycemic response
1
rest of day blood glucose concentrations
1
ad libitum food intake
1
glycemic index
1
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q6
Which 30 trials of Orange Juice posted no result?
Posted no result
30 of 30 completed trials
Registrations
NCT04744233, NCT00918918, NCT01102062, NCT01743300, NCT01680484 and NCT01245244, and 24 more
Completion dates
oldest 2002-11; newest 2023-10-30
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT04744233
2002-11
NCT00918918
2009-11
NCT01102062
2009-12
NCT01743300
2010-12
NCT01680484
2012-01
NCT01245244
2012-09
14 further recorded trials
NCT03026569
2012-09
NCT03032120
2012-11
NCT01738906
2012-12
NCT01963416
2012-12
NCT01350843
2013-02
NCT01201603
2013-11
NCT03209596
2014-08-29
NCT02027415
2014-10
NCT00513760
2014-12
NCT02587507
2015-10
NCT02685124
2016-02
NCT02914249
2016-08
NCT02143011
2016-12
NCT03032861
2017-02
Q7
At the median, Orange Juice's trials enrolled 30 people — anything larger?
Median enrolment
30
Largest enrolment
180
Registered trials counted
37
Q8
Was Orange Juice studied with fasting and exercise?
fasting and exercise are named in Orange Juice's label sentences: "In this acute randomised crossover trial, 20 healthy adults (10 normal weight, 10 overweight/obese) consumed two slices of white (100 g, fibre 3.6 g) or wholemeal bread (88 g, fibre 5.6 g) alongside 150 ml of orange juice and 10 g butter on separate visits in random order after fasting for 8-12…" openfda-label+europepmc · 2025-01-05
2 recorded statements; fasting, exercise
Show the evidence
fasting
In this acute randomised crossover trial, 20 healthy adults (10 normal weight, 10 overweight/obese) consumed two slices of white (100 g, fibre 3.6 g) or wholemeal bread (88 g, fibre 5.6 g) alongside 150 ml of orange juice and 10 g butter on separate visits in random order after fasting for 8-12 hours.
exercise
Subjects were given 4 oz of orange juice alone or orange juice and 0.5 g MCT per kg lean body mass, 20 min prior to exercise in a randomized cross-over design.
recorded 2025-01-05 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q9
What is recorded about Orange Juice and NAD+?
"A comprehensive mitochondrial support protocol targeting NAD+ repletion, electron transport chain function, and oxidative stress was initiated, with all components delivered in fresh-squeezed orange juice." — where Orange Juice and NAD+ appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2026-07-21
NAD+; PMID 42553540
Show the evidence
NAD+PMID 42553540
"A comprehensive mitochondrial support protocol targeting NAD+ repletion, electron transport chain function, and oxidative stress was initiated, with all components delivered in fresh-squeezed orange juice."
recorded 2026-07-21 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registeredIdentifiers, relations and other names
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work
✗ required summary fields resolved: 4 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
✓ public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
✓ source coverage passed: 7 source rows
✓ no critical contamination: no quarantine open
✓ canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
✓ no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.