The use the label states, quoted from it. No plain-language version of this sentence has been written.
The use the label states, quoted from it. It is written for a clinician, not for a reader without medical training.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 41 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Stand-in result
A stand-in result is a number measured because the real result takes too long.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
It is like judging a journey by the speedometer rather than by arriving.
Where that stops being true. Speed does predict arrival. Many stand-in results do not predict the real one.
What people get wrong. A stand-in result is often reported as the result itself.
A surrogate endpoint substituted for a clinical endpoint, valid only where the substitution has been shown to hold.
Enzyme
An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.
Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.
What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.
A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.
Receptor
A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.
Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.
What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.
A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.
Pathway
A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A pathway is like a row of dominoes.
Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.
What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.
An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What was measured, goal by goal
One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.
Registered studies list 22 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.
There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.
Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
Goal
Life outcome
What a body can do
How a person feels
A test result
A step in the body
Harms
How long
Who was studied
Body weight
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved1 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Blood sugar
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved1 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Cholesterol
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.
△Only a number moved1 registered test measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Body weight
body weight
Blood sugar
blood glucose
Cholesterol
changes in levels of circulating triglycerides
Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.
What each mark on this table means
∅ Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
△ Only a number moved
1 registered test measure.
— Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.
… Waiting for a reviewer
Who was studied is listed further down the page.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What happened in people
Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.
Quality of Bowel Preparation
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT02621658
How many people
1000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Functional Constipation (FC) Participants: Change From Baseline in 12-week SBM (Spontaneous Bowel Movement) Frequency Rate (SBMs/Week) During the Study Intervention Period
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT04026113
How many people
438
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
What a body can do day to day
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
HgbA1c
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT05228860
How many people
360
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Total effective rate
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT03320538
How many people
360
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Single-meal intake
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT01141140
How many people
355
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Clinical safety through serological markers of coeliac disease and intestinal wall integrity, clinical and bioumoral parameters of nutrition status, frequency and clinical type of dyspeptic disorders or other adverse reactions.
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT00808301
How many people
300
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route. Topical
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
□Living longer, or avoiding a major eventNo evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.No registered study measures this.
■What a body can do day to dayEvidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.1 registered measure of this kind.
■Measured performanceEvidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.1 registered measure of this kind.
■Symptoms and quality of lifeEvidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.2 registered measures of this kind.
■A number that stands in for healthEvidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.4 registered measures of this kind.
■A step measured inside a personEvidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
■AnimalsEvidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in Mouse. A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
■Cells in a dishEvidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
□A guess from softwareNo evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Felt, measured, or meaningful
Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.
Felt
Things a person could notice without a test.
client satisfaction questionnaire
daily symptom self report completed
Measured
Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.
body weight
blood glucose
changes in levels of circulating triglycerides
heart rate
Meaningful
Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.
disability
A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.
Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.
Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.
Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.
Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.
Names that fit none of the three (15)
investigator global assessment
overall number of line related infections
repigmentation of pa lesions measured by colorimetry
melanin index
preterm infant skin microbiome
corrects scale
napsi
site adoption
improved palliative care access
fidelity
penetration
recruitment rate
retention rate
incidence of treatment related adverse events
incidence of re operation
These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
People similar to this profile were included.
Directions *Wash affected area and dry thoroughly Apply twice daily (morning and night) over the affected area, or as directed by a physician. Use daily for 4 weeks, pay special attention to the spaces between the toes; wear well-fitting ventilated shoes, and change shoes and socks at least once daily.
Who is missing from the studies
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Where the result stopped carrying
This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely.
On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.
It was studied in different people
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
The evidence may simply be wrong
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Prescription only
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Topical
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form and route recorded on this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
Not usually supervised: sold as a supplement or food ingredient where recorded. That is a legal category, not a safety judgement.
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
The identity record classes it as a supplement ingredient; no medicines register records an approval.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Sold as cream, gel, chewable gel, lotion, given by the topical, cutaneous, oral route.
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
# Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to take∅Nothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
∅Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Reports sent to a regulator
These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction.
Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing.
The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete.
News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report.
A count is not a rate and not a risk.
Oatmeal appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 2 most-reported reaction terms, 5 reaction mentions were counted. One report can name several reactions.
The recorded terms (2)
drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms — 4 reaction mentions
silicon granuloma — 1 reaction mentions
open-targets-adr · recorded 2026-06-24 · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Topical
✎ Source-linked record
Where this came from
A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.
The form used in the studies cited on this page.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
243 products list this as an active ingredient in the United States drug directory. 234 of them contain it and nothing else.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 71570-001 · read 2026-08-29
They are sold as aerosol, foam, chewable gel, cloth, cream, emulsion and gel, taken cutaneous, oral and topical.
FDA National Drug Code directory · 71570-001 · read 2026-08-29
The regulator's established pharmacologic class for it is allergens [cs], cell-mediated immunity [pe] and dietary proteins [cs].
FDA National Drug Code directory · 71570-001 · read 2026-08-29
240 published labels name it as an active ingredient. 231 of them describe this substance alone, which is where its own label text on this page comes from.
US prescribing information · 2d813455-c268-4c6d-9952-eaf0e0007d90 · read 2026-08-29
Those labels are classed as human otc drug.
US prescribing information · 2d813455-c268-4c6d-9952-eaf0e0007d90 · read 2026-08-29
425 marketed supplement labels list this ingredient, classed as amino acid/protein and other combinations.
Those labels carry all other, nutrient and structure/function claims. A claim of that kind is written by the manufacturer and is not assessed by any regulator, so its presence says nothing about whether it is true.
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
6 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
Recorded evidence blocks (10)
Q1
What did Oatmeal's largest trial (600 people) and its longest (5.5 years) measure?
600 people in Oatmeal's largest registered study, 5.5 years in its longest registered window, measuring Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)Scores According to Location. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
21 na, 9 phase2, 7 phase4, 4 phase3, 3 phase1, 2 early phase1; NCT00179959; 2011-03. Last human test completed 2026, NCT06750653.
Interpretation These counts include studies where Oatmeal was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.
Show the evidence
na
21
phase2
9
phase4
7
phase3
4
phase1
3
early phase1
2
1 more recorded row
Last recorded human testNCT06750653
2026-04-02
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q2
From mouse to human: where has Oatmeal shown mechanism-only?
"Change of practice to antibiotic impregnated catheters and large study published showing their efficacy. Made topical antibiotics obselete."; 3 of 43 registered studies
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT00990392
withdrawn; "Change of practice to antibiotic impregnated catheters and large study published showing their efficacy. Made topical antibiotics obselete."
NCT04329221
withdrawn; "The study was withdrawn due to lack of financial support."
NCT04642287
withdrawn; "The study was withdrawn due to lack of financial support."
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q4
Could one person measure Oatmeal's effect on investigator global assessment?
Investigator global assessment: measured in Oatmeal's trials.
Interpretation investigator global assessment is the recorded endpoint.
Show the evidence
biomarkers
investigator global assessment; 2026-09-01
overall number of line related infections; 2026-09-01
repigmentation of pa lesions measured by colorimetry; 2026-09-01
melanin index; 2026-09-01
preterm infant skin microbiome; 2026-09-01
corrects scale; 2026-09-01
14 more recorded rows
biomarkers
body weight; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
blood glucose; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
changes in levels of circulating triglycerides; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
client satisfaction questionnaire; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
disability; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
napsi; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
daily symptom self report completed; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
site adoption; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
improved palliative care access; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
fidelity; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
penetration; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
heart rate; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
recruitment rate; 2026-09-01
biomarkers
retention rate; 2026-09-01
human trials at or under30
16
Not recorded for this substance
a recorded half-life
smallest human trial
0; NCT00990392; NA; the smallest recorded human enrolment at or below 30; the registry states no direction of its result; WITHDRAWN
Q5
Which of blood glucose, body weight and changes in levels of circulating triglycerides did Oatmeal's trials measure?
blood glucose, body weight and changes in levels of circulating triglycerides lead 22 outcome terms across Oatmeal's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
Interpretation melanin index, preterm infant skin microbiome, corrects scale, body weight, blood glucose and changes in levels of circulating triglycerides follow.
Show the evidence
investigator global assessment
1
overall number of line related infections
1
repigmentation of pa lesions measured by colorimetry
1
melanin index
1
preterm infant skin microbiome
1
corrects scale
1
14 more recorded rows
body weight
1
blood glucose
1
changes in levels of circulating triglycerides
1
client satisfaction questionnaire
1
disability
1
napsi
1
daily symptom self report completed
1
site adoption
1
improved palliative care access
1
fidelity
1
penetration
1
heart rate
1
recruitment rate
1
retention rate
1
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q6
What will the one ongoing trial of Oatmeal report, and when?
"CO2Lift and T-Junction Breakdown Rates Evaluation After Breast Reduction Surgery Pilot Trial"; n 10; "Recruitment Rate"; 2027-12-31
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q7
Which 22 trials of Oatmeal posted no result?
Posted no result
22 of 22 completed trials
Registrations
NCT02035150, NCT01512017, NCT01078428, NCT01388517, NCT02101632 and NCT01847053, and 16 more
Completion dates
oldest 2002-12; newest 2023-09-22
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT02035150
2002-12
NCT01512017
2010-05
NCT01078428
2010-06
NCT01388517
2011-01
NCT02101632
2014-03
NCT01847053
2014-04
14 further recorded trials
NCT02019355
2015-03
NCT03134079
2015-11-20
NCT02616159
2016-01
NCT02575131
2016-07
NCT02818452
2016-08
NCT03165773
2016-08
NCT02651597
2016-12-10
NCT02801305
2017-03
NCT02836106
2017-04
NCT03946826
2017-08-01
NCT03095872
2018-02-05
NCT03279328
2018-07-31
NCT03781349
2019-12
NCT03447925
2020-01-01
Q8
At the median, Oatmeal's trials enrolled 38 people — anything larger?
Median enrolment
38
Largest enrolment
600
Registered trials counted
43
Q9
What do 5 spontaneous reports say about Oatmeal — and not say?
These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction. Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing. The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete. News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report. A count is not a rate and not a risk.
Oatmeal appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 2 most-reported reaction terms, 5 reaction mentions were counted: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms 4; silicon granuloma 1. open-targets-adr · CHEMBL2109173 · 2026-06-24
Show the evidence
drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms
4
silicon granuloma
1
recorded 2026-06-24 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q10
What is recorded about Oatmeal and sirtuin?
"To address this, a tetrahedral DNA functionalized with saRNA targeting SIRT1 activation is engineered, termed TSA." — where Oatmeal and sirtuin appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2026-08-04
"To address this, a tetrahedral DNA functionalized with saRNA targeting SIRT1 activation is engineered, termed TSA."
autophagyPMID 34922208
"saRNA mediated NIS mRNA and protein upregulated in SW579 cells. saRNA-mediated NIS expression inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis and autophagy, and promoted iodide uptake in SW579 cells."
mTORPMID 34922208
"saRNA-mediated NIS expression acted as a critical role in increasing iodide uptake via AMPK/mTOR pathway in thyroid cancer."
AMPKPMID 34922208
"saRNA-mediated NIS expression acted as a critical role in increasing iodide uptake via AMPK/mTOR pathway in thyroid cancer."
autophagyPMID 42547502
"We show that β-cell-targeted aptamer-VEGF-A small activating RNA (saRNA) chimeras selectively induce robust VEGF-A expression in mouse and human islets independently of hypoxia- or nutrient-stress pathways, without activating autophagy or stress-responsive genes."
NAD+
"The Cepeda Framework integrates five regulatory principles — (I) stoichiometric 3:2:1 OCT4:SOX2:KLF4 polycistronic m1Ψ-saRNA; (II) 72-hour intrinsic saRNA pulse; (III) LEAD-7294 dual-miRNA logic gate (kill-switch + Let-7/L7Ae/Kt activation gate); (IV) NRF2/NAD + /paracrine microenvironmental co-treatment; (V) Genesis-TERT-01 transient hTERT telomere restoration — with five companion protocols…"
1 more recorded row
sirtuinPMID 35895511
"In this study, we investigate the therapeutic potential of activating SIRT1 using small activating RNAs (saRNA), thereby reducing inflammatory-like responses and re-establishing normal lipid metabolism."
recorded 2026-08-04 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registeredIdentifiers, relations and other names
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · Open Targets 26.06 — CC0 · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md
✗ required summary fields resolved: 5 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Most important common problem, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
✓ public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
✓ source coverage passed: 8 source rows
✓ no critical contamination: no quarantine open
✓ canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
✓ no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.