Skip to content

Cetylpyridinium

  • Prescription medicine
  • Prescription only
  • Identity checked
  • Sources last checked 2026-09-04

This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.

What Cetylpyridinium does in the body

Aids in the removal and prevention of plaque that leads to gingivitis.

Why people take it. Aids in the removal and prevention of plaque that leads to gingivitis.

What happened in people

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

A fixed RNAWiki sentence

Where this came from

Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.

No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.

No source is stored against this line.

The limit that matters most

Not recorded.

Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

What the registries record it as

  • The substance registry classes this as chemical.

    FDA substance registry · CUB7JI0JV3 · read 2026-08-29

Where each sentence above came from

The use the label states, quoted from it. No plain-language version of this sentence has been written.

The use the label states, quoted from it. It is written for a clinician, not for a reader without medical training.

No statement of the main limit is recorded.

The four opening statements run to 37 words.

Words this page uses

Four words worth knowing first

Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.

Biomarker

A biomarker is a number from a test that stands in for something about health.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A biomarker is like a fuel gauge.

Where that stops being true. A gauge is wired to the tank. Many biomarkers are only loosely tied to health.

What people get wrong. A better number is read as a better life. Several medicines improved a number and helped nobody.

A measurable indicator used as a substitute for a clinical outcome of interest.

Placebo

A placebo is a dummy treatment given so the real one can be compared with it.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

A placebo is like a blank control in an experiment.

Where that stops being true. A blank does nothing. People given a placebo often do get better.

What people get wrong. A placebo effect is read as imaginary. The improvement is measured and real.

An inactive intervention matched in appearance to the test intervention, used to control for non-specific effects.

Comparator

A comparator is whatever the treatment was measured against.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

It is like the other runner in a race.

Where that stops being true. A race has one winner. A study can show both arms improved.

What people get wrong. Results are read without asking what the other group got. Beating nothing is not beating a treatment.

The control condition against which the experimental intervention is assessed.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What was measured, goal by goal

One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.

Registered studies list 26 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.

There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.

Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
GoalLife outcomeWhat a body can doHow a person feelsA test resultA step in the bodyHarmsHow longWho was studied
Healthy ageingWaiting for a reviewer2 registered study measure of this kind. No reviewed result yet.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
FocusNothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a symptom measure for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Healthy ageing
cardiovascular mortality; all cause mortality; frailty
Focus
cognitive

Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.

What each mark on this table means
Waiting for a reviewer
2 registered study measure of this kind. No reviewed result yet.
Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What happened in people

Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.

Dental Claims

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT07619729
How many people
10000
Study design
Phase 4
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Proportion of small vulnerable newborn births

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT07553286
How many people
2280
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Change From Baseline in Löe-Silness Gingivitis Index

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT01549587
How many people
746
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Time to healing of the primary lesion complex (in days or fraction thereof) as assessed by the investigator.

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT01695187
How many people
362
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT01265446
How many people
250
Study design
Phase 3
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Change in Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) From Baseline to 30 Minutes

The study did not show it

Who was studied
NCT05178173
How many people
230
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated

What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.

The limits of this study, and where it came from

Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.

How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.

Form and route. Oral

Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary

Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.

  • openFDA NDC Directory · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • openFDA SPL label · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • PubChem PUG-REST · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
  • FDA label (openFDA SPL) · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How close this is to real life

The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.

  1. Living longer, or avoiding a major event Evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.2 registered measures of this kind. No reviewed result.
  2. What a body can do day to day No evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
  3. Measured performance No evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
  4. Symptoms and quality of life No evidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.No registered study measures this.
  5. A number that stands in for health No evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.No registered study measures this.
  6. A step measured inside a person Evidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
  7. Animals No evidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.No animal record is stored.
  8. Cells in a dish Evidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
  9. A guess from software No evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.

Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Felt, measured, or meaningful

Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.

Felt

Things a person could notice without a test.

No registered study measured anything of this kind.

Measured

Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.

No registered study measured anything of this kind.

Meaningful

Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.

  • cardiovascular mortality
  • all cause mortality

A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.

Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.

Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.

Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.

Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.

Names that fit none of the three (24)
  • physical activity
  • smoking abstinence
  • il 6
  • acceptability
  • major cardiovascular events
  • chewing function i
  • periodontal disease
  • risk factors for periodontal disease
  • dental caries
  • risk factors for dental caries
  • muscle function
  • incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia
  • sars cov 2 viral load
  • decayed missing and/or filled primary tooth surfaces
  • wound healing
  • microbiome
  • cognitive
  • diet
  • frailty
  • pharmacokinetics cmax

These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Were people like you studied?

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.

Who was studied

People similar to this profile were included.

  • Helps prevent gingivitis, an early form of gum disease, and bleeding gums Helps control plaque that leads to gingivitis and bleeding gums Directions Adults and children 12 years of age and older: Vigorously swish 20 mL (4 teaspoonfuls) of rinse between your teeth twice a day for 30 seconds and then spit out. Do not swallow the rinse. Children 6 years to under 12 years: Supervise use.

Who is missing from the studies

  • Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

Where the result stopped carrying

  • This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
  • It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Why it might seem to do nothing

A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.

It was studied for a different goal

The studies measured something else entirely.

On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.

It was studied in different people

The people in the studies were not much like the reader.

On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

The evidence may simply be wrong

Small early studies often do not hold up.

On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.

None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What taking it involves

The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.

How it is supplied

Prescription only

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

Read from the recorded approval status.

No source is stored against this line.

Form and route

Oral

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form and route recorded on this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

Who oversees it

RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

No register row and no identity class settled the question.

No source is stored against this line.

What is in the pack

Sold as mouthwash, rinse, liquid, spray, given by the oral, topical, buccal route.

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

Recorded notes on how this is sold and what that means for what is in the pack.

No source is stored against this line.

Where it is registered

Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.

Counted from records

Where this came from

A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.

Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.

No source is stored against this line.

Why people stop

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

What it would be like to takeNothing found in the sources checked

What can go wrong

Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Reports sent to a regulator

  • These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction.
  • Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing.
  • The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete.
  • News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report.
  • A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Cetylpyridinium appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 5 most-reported reaction terms, 10 reaction mentions were counted. One report can name several reactions.

The recorded terms (5)
  • ageusia — 3 reaction mentions
  • dysgeusia — 3 reaction mentions
  • oral disorder — 2 reaction mentions
  • metastases to soft tissue — 1 reaction mentions
  • prostate cancer recurrent — 1 reaction mentions
  • open-targets-adr · recorded 2026-06-24 · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot

Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.

Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What is missing or unclearNothing found in the sources checked

Does the exact form matter?

Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.

The form that was studied

Oral

Source-linked record

Where this came from

A person wrote this into the record with the study named beside it. No reviewer has signed it off.

The form used in the studies cited on this page.

No source is stored against this line.

What is sold

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.

No source is stored against this line.

Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What you could measure

This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.

RNAWiki could not confidently classify this substance, so no self-experiment plan is offered.

Questions worth asking

  • Which of the trials of Cetylpyridinium studied people like me?
  • What was measured, and for how long?
  • Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
  • What would we watch for, and when would we stop?

Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.

RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What nobody knows yet

Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.

How much did people take in the studies?

The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.

Why it matters. A result belongs to an amount. Without the amount the result floats free.

What would answer it

A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

How fast does the body clear it?

The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.

Why it matters. Without this, nothing on this page can say how long anything lasts.

What would answer it

A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing populations

Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing long-term data

No completed tested study window is recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

No reviewed conclusion

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing interaction studies

No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Formulation uncertainty

Several salts, forms or products of Cetylpyridinium are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Mechanism not reviewed

No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

What happened in peopleRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Check any of this yourself

Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.

Where else this substance is registered

FDA substance identifier (UNII)
CUB7JI0JV3
CAS registry number
7773-52-6
PubChem compound
2683
ChEBI
32914
RxNorm concept
2286
EMA substance identifier
100000076346
DrugBank
DB11073

Checks this page had to pass

  • Passed

    Identity resolved

    no open identity hold

  • Passed

    No unresolved merge across substance families

    no quarantine open

  • Passed

    Every public sentence names a source

    The opening statement carries the origin: Quoted from a stored source.

  • Not passed

    Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence

    No registered study is classified as testing this substance.

  • Passed

    No internal keys in reader text

    enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

  • Not passed

    Safety mode resolved

    No register row and no identity class settled the question.

  • Passed

    Canonical metadata present

    slug and display name present

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What to learn next

Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.

This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.

What is not here

7 questions this page could not answer

These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.

  • The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How this medicine reached us — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.

The record as stored

The full record, for auditing

Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.

Recorded evidence blocks (11)

What did Cetylpyridinium's largest trial (4837 people) and its longest (38 years) measure?


4837 people in Cetylpyridinium's largest registered study, 38 years in its longest registered window, measuring frailty. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

10 na, 5 phase2, 4 phase3, 3 na or unstated, 3 phase1, 3 phase4, 2 early phase1; NCT03192410; 2040-01. Last human test completed 2024, NCT06607172.

Interpretation These counts include studies where Cetylpyridinium was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.

Show the evidence
  • na
    10
  • phase2
    5
  • phase3
    4
  • na or unstated
    3
  • phase1
    3
  • phase4
    3
2 more recorded rows
  • early phase1
    2
  • Last recorded human test NCT06607172
    2024-10-22

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Cetylpyridinium was tested only in human — what did it show?


human: healthspan (29): the rungs where Cetylpyridinium has a recorded finding. Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov · organism ladder · 2026-09-01

Interpretation frailty — the recorded outcome words.

Yeast C. elegans Drosophila Mouse Rat Dog Non-human primate Human healthspan
Show the evidence
  • human NCT05865340
    healthspan; frailty; 29

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

2 of Cetylpyridinium's trials stopped: safety, accrual/recruitment?


safety (1) and accrual/recruitment (1): Cetylpyridinium's stop wording, clustered. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

"The funder decided not to continue funding, causing enrollment to cease prematurely and curtailing originally planned analyses. Participants with any samples collected after the baseline pre-rinse samples were included in the analysis."; 2 of 29 registered studies

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT04409873
    terminated; "The funder decided not to continue funding, causing enrollment to cease prematurely and curtailing originally planned analyses. Participants with any samples collected after the baseline pre-rinse samples were included in the analysis."
  • NCT04556175
    terminated; "Safety concerns for study participants and non-feasibility of enrollment due to the COVID-19 pandemic."

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Could one person measure Cetylpyridinium's effect on physical activity?


Physical activity: measured in Cetylpyridinium's trials.

Interpretation physical activity is the recorded endpoint.

Show the evidence

biomarkers

  • physical activity; 2026-09-01
  • smoking abstinence; 2026-09-01
  • il 6; 2026-09-01
  • acceptability; 2026-09-01
  • cardiovascular mortality; 2026-09-01
  • all cause mortality; 2026-09-01
14 more recorded rows
  • biomarkers
    major cardiovascular events; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    chewing function i; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    periodontal disease; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    risk factors for periodontal disease; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    dental caries; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    risk factors for dental caries; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    muscle function; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    sars cov 2 viral load; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    decayed missing and/or filled primary tooth surfaces; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    wound healing; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    microbiome; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    cognitive; 2026-09-01
  • biomarkers
    diet; 2026-09-01
  • human trials at or under30
    8
  • Not recorded for this substance
    a recorded half-life
  • smallest human trial
    0; NCT03026205; PHASE2; the smallest recorded human enrolment at or below 30; the registry states no direction of its result; WITHDRAWN

Which of acceptability, all cause mortality and bleeding did Cetylpyridinium's trials measure?


acceptability, all cause mortality and bleeding lead 26 outcome terms across Cetylpyridinium's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

Interpretation acceptability, cardiovascular mortality, all cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, chewing function i and periodontal disease follow.

Show the evidence
  • physical activity
    1
  • smoking abstinence
    1
  • il 6
    1
  • acceptability
    1
  • cardiovascular mortality
    1
  • all cause mortality
    1
14 more recorded rows
  • major cardiovascular events
    1
  • chewing function i
    1
  • periodontal disease
    1
  • risk factors for periodontal disease
    1
  • dental caries
    1
  • risk factors for dental caries
    1
  • muscle function
    1
  • incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia
    1
  • sars cov 2 viral load
    1
  • decayed missing and/or filled primary tooth surfaces
    1
  • wound healing
    1
  • microbiome
    1
  • cognitive
    1
  • diet
    1

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which of Cetylpyridinium's 4 ongoing trials reports first?


4 registered trials of Cetylpyridinium are open; earliest completion 2025-12-01. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01

Cardiovascular mortality; BMI; latest 2040-01

Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT03192410
    "Prospective Cohort Study of 4,837 Post-myocardial Infarction Patients (Alpha Omega Cohort)"; n 4837; "Cardiovascular mortality"; 2040-01
  • NCT06673433
    "The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Macro-genome and Metabolism of Obese Patients."; n 300; "BMI"; 2025-12-01
  • NCT06857890
    "Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Grammidin With Anesthetic, a Metered Dose Topical Spray in Healthy Volunteers"; n 24; "Pharmacokinetics - Cmax"; 2026-12-01
  • NCT06859281
    "Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Grammidin, a Metered Dose Topical Spray in Healthy Volunteers"; n 24; "Pharmacokinetics - Cmax"; 2026-12-01

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

Which running trial of Cetylpyridinium could settle lifespan?


NCT03192410 measures Cardiovascular mortality, reading out 2040-01.

1 open trial; n 4837; "Prospective Cohort Study of 4,837 Post-myocardial Infarction Patients (Alpha Omega Cohort)"

Show the evidence
  • Trial NCT03192410
    "Prospective Cohort Study of 4,837 Post-myocardial Infarction Patients (Alpha Omega Cohort)"; n 4837; "Cardiovascular mortality"; 2040-01

Which 16 trials of Cetylpyridinium posted no result?


Posted no result
16 of 16 completed trials
Registrations
NCT00453271, NCT01071811, NCT00885599, NCT07211061, NCT01751620 and NCT02279381, and 10 more
Completion dates
oldest 2008-10; newest 2023-12-31
Show the evidence

Trial

  • NCT00453271
    2008-10
  • NCT01071811
    2009-01
  • NCT00885599
    2010-06
  • NCT07211061
    2011-11-10
  • NCT01751620
    2015-06
  • NCT02279381
    2015-11
10 further recorded trials
  • NCT02297997
    2015-11
  • NCT01860924
    2015-12
  • NCT02575235
    2016-07-01
  • NCT02788786
    2016-11-15
  • NCT04707742
    2021-09-30
  • NCT04320628
    2022-03-01
  • NCT05270382
    2022-12-31
  • NCT04081025
    2023-01-31
  • NCT04325685
    2023-11-07
  • NCT05865340
    2023-12-31

At the median, Cetylpyridinium's trials enrolled 60 people — anything larger?


Median enrolment
60
Largest enrolment
4837
Registered trials counted
29

What do 10 spontaneous reports say about Cetylpyridinium — and not say?


These are reports people sent to a regulator. They do not show the medicine caused the reaction. Nobody counted how many people took the medicine and reported nothing. The same event can be reported more than once, and many reports are incomplete. News coverage, lawsuits and new warnings change how often people report. A count is not a rate and not a risk.

Cetylpyridinium appears in spontaneous reports to regulators. Across the 5 most-reported reaction terms, 10 reaction mentions were counted: ageusia 3; dysgeusia 3; oral disorder 2; metastases to soft tissue 1. open-targets-adr · CHEMBL2003538 · 2026-06-24

Show the evidence
  • ageusia
    3
  • dysgeusia
    3
  • oral disorder
    2
  • metastases to soft tissue
    1
  • prostate cancer recurrent
    1

recorded 2026-06-24 · last checked 2026-09-04

What is recorded about Cetylpyridinium and AMPK?


"Through screening we isolated cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), a drug known to dose-dependently inhibit mitochondrial complex 1, as a potent and dose-dependent AMPK stimulator." — where Cetylpyridinium and AMPK appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2019-10-22

AMPK, NAD+; PMID 31654752, 142981

Show the evidence
  • AMPK PMID 31654752
    "Through screening we isolated cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), a drug known to dose-dependently inhibit mitochondrial complex 1, as a potent and dose-dependent AMPK stimulator."
  • NAD+ PMID 142981
    "They are similar to chloride cetylpyridinium in their ability to disrupt the osmotic barrier of protoplasts and to inhibit NAD-H-oxidase of membrane fractions of Micrococcus lysodeikticus."

recorded 2019-10-22 · last checked 2026-09-04

Where it is registered
Identifiers, relations and other names

The exact record

ChEMBL id
CHEMBL2003538
PubChem CID
22324
CAS number
6004-24-6
RxCUI
2287
InChIKey
NEUSVAOJNUQRTM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Also called
Cetylpyridinium chloride
Trade name
Ceepryn, Cepacol, Gppe dental rinse, Merocet, Merocets, Merocets plus, Merovit, Search, Steradent, Antigingivitis/Antiplaque, Antiseptic, Health
Salt form
Cetylpyridinium chloride hydrate, Cetylpyridinium chloride monohydrate, Gppe oral liq
Also called
Chlorure de cetylpyridinium, Cloruro de cetilpiridinio, cpc, CETYLPYRIDINIUM CATION, CETYLPYRIDINIUM ION, CETYLPYRIDINIUM [VANDF], CETYLPYRIDINUM, Cetylpyridinium [WHO-DD], PYRIDINIUM, 1-HEXADECYL
Development code
NB-002, NSC-14864, NSC-756673
Component
Cetylpyridinium chloride
Sources (7)

Sources

1 more source

ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · Open Targets 26.06 — CC0 · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md

How these records are assembled · Which registers were checked

Index-quality checks
  • identity passed: no open identity hold
  • required summary fields resolved: 5 required field(s) not terminal: Why people use it, Best-supported result, Most important common problem, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
  • public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
  • source coverage passed: 7 source rows
  • no critical contamination: no quarantine open
  • canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
  • no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.