Skip to content

Bulevirtide-Gmod

  • Biologic
  • Prescription only
  • Identity checked
  • Sources last checked 2026-09-04

This page shows what was measured, who it was measured in, and what that does not settle.

RNAWiki holds very little about this substance. The page shows what there is.

What Bulevirtide-Gmod does in the body

HEPCLUDEX is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection in adults without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis.

HEPCLUDEX is an antiviral drug [see Microbiology (12.4) ]. Mechanism of Action Bulevirtide is a synthetic 47-amino acid lipopeptide with a myristoylated N-terminus and an amidated C-terminus derived from amino acids 13-59 of the L-HBsAg preS1 domain from an HBV genotype (GT)-C consensus sequence (corresponding to GT-D preS1 amino acids 2-48). Bulevirtide inhibits HDV infection by binding to the HDV receptor NTCP on the plasma membrane of hepatocytes, blocking HDV attachment to NTCP.

Why people take it. HEPCLUDEX is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection in adults without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis.

What happened in people

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

A fixed RNAWiki sentence

Where this came from

Wording RNAWiki always uses, not a finding about this substance.

No reviewed claim names a result for any goal on this record.

No source is stored against this line.

The limit that matters most

Not recorded.

Where it acts
Not recorded.
Kind of result
No result is published, so no kind of result applies yet
Supervision
RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

What the registries record it as

  • Its recorded molecular formula is C248H355N65O72, weighing 5398.9 Da.

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

Where each sentence above came from

The use the label states, quoted from it. No plain-language version of this sentence has been written.

The use the label states, quoted from it. It is written for a clinician, not for a reader without medical training.

No statement of the main limit is recorded.

The four opening statements run to 127 words.

Words this page uses

Four words worth knowing first

Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.

Formulation

A formulation is the exact made-up form a substance comes in.

A picture of it, and where the picture fails

It is like the difference between a whole bean and instant coffee.

Where that stops being true. Coffee tastes different. A formulation can change how much reaches the blood.

What people get wrong. Two products with the same name are assumed to behave the same. They often do not.

The specific composition and physical form of a product, including salt, excipients and release profile.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Were people like you studied?

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.

Who was studied

People similar to this profile were included.

  • Chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection

Who is missing from the studies

  • Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What the label states about particular groups

  • On pediatric, the label states: “The safety and effectiveness of HEPCLUDEX in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age have not been established.”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

  • On older people, the label states: “Clinical trials of HEPCLUDEX did not include participants aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger participants [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

  • On people who are pregnant, the label states: “Risk Summary There are insufficient human data on the use of HEPCLUDEX during pregnancy to inform a drug-associated risk of birth defects and miscarriage.”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

  • On people who are breastfeeding, the label states: “Risk Summary It is not known whether bulevirtide is present in human breast milk, affects human milk production, or has effects on the breastfed infant.”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

  • On people with reduced liver function, the label states: “No dosage adjustment of HEPCLUDEX is recommended in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A) [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

  • On people with reduced kidney function, the label states: “No dosage adjustment of HEPCLUDEX is recommended in patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] greater than or equal to 15 mL per minute) [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].”

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

Where the result stopped carrying

  • This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
  • It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.

RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Why it might seem to do nothing

A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.

It was studied in different people

The people in the studies were not much like the reader.

On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

A different form was studied

The studied form is not the form on the shelf.

On this record: This record is linked to 1 related forms. Evidence does not carry across all of them.

The evidence may simply be wrong

Small early studies often do not hold up.

On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.

None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What taking it involves

The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.

How it is supplied

Prescription only

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

Read from the recorded approval status.

No source is stored against this line.

Form and route

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

No form or route is recorded.

No source is stored against this line.

Who oversees it

RNAWiki has not recorded a supervision or regulatory status for this substance.

Quoted from a source

Where this came from

Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.

No register row and no identity class settled the question.

No source is stored against this line.

What is in the pack

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

Nothing is recorded about product quality.

No source is stored against this line.

Where it is registered

Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.

Counted from records

Where this came from

A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.

Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.

No source is stored against this line.

Why people stop

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.

No source is stored against this line.

What it would be like to takeNothing found in the sources checked

What can go wrong

Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.

Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

Does the exact form matter?

Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.

The form that was studied

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

The exact form studied is not recorded.

No source is stored against this line.

What is sold

Not recorded.

Nothing recorded

Where this came from

RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.

Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.

No source is stored against this line.

What is recorded as being sold

  • HEPCLUDEX is subcutaneous at 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS For injection: 8.5 mg as a white to off-white lyophilized powder or cake in a single-dose vial for reconstitution., recorded as fda label in effect 2026-05-22 in the United States.

    US prescribing information · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · read 2026-08-30

Evidence carries across two names for one substance. It does not carry across a salt, a mirror form or a mixture.

Names and forms linked to this record

  • Biosimilar of

    Bulevirtide

    Evidence on this page does not automatically apply to this one.

What it would be like to takeRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What you could measure

This one is decided with a clinician, so this section holds questions to ask rather than a plan to run.

RNAWiki could not confidently classify this substance, so no self-experiment plan is offered.

Questions worth asking

  • Which of the trials of Bulevirtide-Gmod studied people like me?
  • What was measured, and for how long?
  • Was the result a laboratory value or a health outcome?
  • What would we watch for, and when would we stop?

Tracking can show whether something changed for you. It cannot show what caused it.

RNAWiki records evidence. It does not say whether this substance is right for you.

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What nobody knows yet

Open questions, each with why it is open and what would close it.

How much did people take in the studies?

The sources RNAWiki checked hold nothing for this field.

Why it matters. A result belongs to an amount. Without the amount the result floats free.

What would answer it

A stored source that records it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing populations

Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing long-term data

No completed tested study window is recorded.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

No reviewed conclusion

RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Missing interaction studies

No interaction was found in the registers checked. Not finding one is not the same as showing there is none.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Formulation uncertainty

Several salts, forms or products of Bulevirtide-Gmod are recorded. Results from one form may not transfer to another.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

Mechanism not reviewed

No reviewed mechanism story exists for this substance.

Why it matters. Recorded by the evidence model as a gap on this record.

What would answer it

A study that measures it, and a reviewer to sign it off.

Last checked 2026-09-04. Searched: The sources listed in the receipts at the foot of this page.

What happened in peopleNothing found in the sources checked

Check any of this yourself

Every line above traced back to the study it came from. This is the technical layer, and the vocabulary changes here.

Nothing found in the sources checked

No traced study record is stored for this substance.

The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.

Checks this page had to pass

  • Passed

    Identity resolved

    no open identity hold

  • Passed

    No unresolved merge across substance families

    no quarantine open

  • Passed

    Every public sentence names a source

    The opening statement carries the origin: Quoted from a stored source.

  • Not passed

    Trial roles classified for highlighted evidence

    No registered study is classified as testing this substance.

  • Passed

    No internal keys in reader text

    enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

  • Not passed

    Safety mode resolved

    No register row and no identity class settled the question.

  • Passed

    Canonical metadata present

    slug and display name present

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

How this medicine reached us

Kept near the foot of the page. A historical event moves up only when it changes something about this substance today.

What the approval register records

  • 1 approved application covers products containing this substance. The earliest was BLA761468, approved 20260522 to GILEAD SCIENCES INC.

    Drugs@FDA application register · BLA761468 · read 2026-08-29

  • Marketing status on the register: prescription.

    Drugs@FDA application register · BLA761468 · read 2026-08-29

What is missing or unclearRead from sources, not yet reviewed

What to learn next

Ordered by what would most change how you read this page, starting with what is easiest to misunderstand.

This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.

What is not here

10 questions this page could not answer

These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.

  • What was measured, goal by goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What happened in people — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How close this is to real life — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Felt, measured, or meaningful — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
  • What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.

The record as stored

The full record, for auditing

Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.

Recorded evidence blocks (4)

On the Bulevirtide-Gmod label: indicated for what?


"HEPCLUDEX is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection in adults without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on a decrease in HDV RNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization [see Clinical Studies (14) ] .": indications and usage on Bulevirtide-Gmod's label. DailyMed label · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · 2026-08-30

13 registered trials of Bulevirtide-Gmod — at which phases?


Registered studies posting no result
7 of 13

13 registered studies of Bulevirtide-Gmod: 5 phase2, 4 phase1, 4 phase3, 3 na or unstated. CLINICALTRIALS_SNAPSHOT · 2026-09-01

0 with a PubMed record

Show the evidence
  • phase2
    5
  • phase1
    4
  • phase3
    4
  • na or unstated
    3
  • completed
    6
  • active not recruiting
    3
3 more recorded rows
  • recruiting
    2
  • approved for marketing
    1
  • unknown
    1

recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04

At the median, Bulevirtide-Gmod's trials enrolled 135 people — anything larger?


Median enrolment
135
Largest enrolment
266
Registered trials counted
12

Bulevirtide-Gmod and CYP1A2, BCRP and CYP3A4: shared by which compounds?


CYP1A2, BCRP and CYP3A4 appear in Bulevirtide-Gmod's recorded interaction sentences, 5 in all. DailyMed label · 12391cc2-38c2-4cf5-86d3-2be9370127fc · 2026-08-30

CYP1A2, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2B6, CYP2C19; 22 shared nodes; pharmacokinetics

Show the evidence

Interaction statement

  • pharmacokinetics
    Transporter Systems: In vitro studies have shown that no clinically relevant interactions are expected for efflux transporters including MDR1, BCRP, BSEP, MATE1, and MATE2K and uptake transporters including OATP2B1, OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, and OCT2.
  • pharmacokinetics
    Bulevirtide is not an inducer of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4.
  • pharmacokinetics
    Drug Interaction Studies Effect of Bulevirtide on Other Drugs Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Enzymes: In vitro studies have shown, bulevirtide is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4.
  • pharmacokinetics
    Consistent with in vitro results, bulevirtide at steady state did not impact the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 probe substrate midazolam, administered as an oral 30 μg microdose, in clinical drug-interaction studies.
  • pharmacokinetics
    In vitro studies have shown that bulevirtide inhibits the organic anion transporting polypeptides, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, with IC 50 values of 0.5 and 8.7 μM, respectively, and taurocholate uptake via NTCP receptors with an IC 50 value of 0.320 μM; however, no clinical drug interaction is expected for OATP1B or NTCP substrates at clinically relevant concentrations of bulevirtide.

CYP1A2

  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Rasagiline, Sofpironium, Golodirsen, Tinidazole
  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Rasagiline, Sofpironium, Golodirsen, Tinidazole
  • CYP2A6
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, Rasagiline, Naldemedine, Methylnaltrexone, Tivozanib, Metaxalone, Selegiline, Trametinib

CYP2B6

  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Sofpironium, Bupropion, Golodirsen, Tinidazole, Naldemedine
  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Sofpironium, Bupropion, Golodirsen, Tinidazole, Naldemedine
  • CYP2C19
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Rasagiline, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Etravirine
  • CYP2C9
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Rasagiline, Golodirsen, Tinidazole, Naldemedine
  • CYP2D6
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, Darunavir Propylene Glycolate, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Rasagiline, Sofpironium, Fluoxetine

CYP3A4

  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, ERYTHROMYCIN LACTOBIONATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Beclometasone, Rasagiline, Sofpironium
  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, ERYTHROMYCIN LACTOBIONATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Beclometasone, Rasagiline, Sofpironium
  • FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, ERYTHROMYCIN LACTOBIONATE, FOSAPREPITANT DIMEGLUMINE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Beclometasone, Rasagiline, Sofpironium
  • BCRP
    TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Eravacycline, Omadacycline
  • BSEP
    Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Eravacycline, Prucalopride, Chenodeoxycholic acid, Trametinib, Eluxadoline, Histidine, Tirbanibulin
  • MATE1
    TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Sofpironium, Golodirsen, Eravacycline, Prucalopride, Chenodeoxycholic acid
  • MATE2-K
    TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Sofpironium, Golodirsen, Eravacycline, Prucalopride, Chenodeoxycholic acid, Methylnaltrexone
  • OAT1
    TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Eravacycline, Prucalopride
  • OAT3
    TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Pemetrexed, Eravacycline
3 more recorded rows
  • OATP1B1
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Eravacycline
  • OATP1B3
    FINGOLIMOD LAURYL SULFATE, TAFAMIDIS MEGLUMINE, Arimoclomol, Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Golodirsen, Naldemedine, Eravacycline
  • OCT1
    Ceftobiprole Medocaril, Deoxycholic acid, Sofpironium, Naldemedine, Eravacycline, Prucalopride, Chenodeoxycholic acid, Methylnaltrexone

recorded 2026-08-30 · last checked 2026-09-04

Where it is registered
Identifiers, relations and other names

The exact record

Relations

Trade name
Hepcludex, MYRCLUDEX
Also called
Bulevirtide acetate, Bulevirtide acetate [WHO-DD]
Sources (4)

Sources

ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · mixed register set; per-register licences in docs/specs/corpus-20k-sources.md · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work

How these records are assembled · Which registers were checked

Index-quality checks
  • identity passed: no open identity hold
  • required summary fields resolved: 3 required field(s) not terminal: Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
  • public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
  • source coverage passed: 4 source rows
  • no critical contamination: no quarantine open
  • canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
  • no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page

This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.