No plain explanation of what this changes is stored.
No recorded use is stored in reader language.
No statement of the main limit is recorded.
The four opening statements run to 26 words.
Words this page uses
Four words worth knowing first
Chosen from what this page shows, with each one explained before the word it depends on.
Protein
A protein is a folded chain your body builds to do a specific job.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A protein is like a tool bent into one shape for one task.
Where that stops being true. A tool keeps its shape. A protein can change shape and stop working.
What people get wrong. Protein in food and a protein in the body are related but not the same thing.
A polymer of amino acids folded into a defined structure that determines its function.
Enzyme
An enzyme is a protein that speeds up one chemical change.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
An enzyme is like a machine on a production line doing one cut.
Where that stops being true. A machine is switched on and off by a person. Enzymes are controlled by the cell.
What people get wrong. Enzymes are thought to be used up. They are not; they work again and again.
A catalytic protein that lowers the activation energy of a specific reaction.
Receptor
A receptor is a part of a cell that a signal fits into.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A receptor is like a lock waiting for one key.
Where that stops being true. A lock either opens or does not. A receptor can be half-triggered, or worn out.
What people get wrong. Fitting a receptor is read as causing a benefit. It causes a step, and nothing more.
A protein that binds a specific ligand and converts that binding into a cellular response.
Pathway
A pathway is a chain of steps inside a cell, each one setting off the next.
A picture of it, and where the picture fails
A pathway is like a row of dominoes.
Where that stops being true. Dominoes fall one way. Pathways loop back and can switch themselves off.
What people get wrong. Changing one step is read as changing the outcome. Other steps often absorb it.
An ordered series of molecular interactions producing a defined cellular change.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What was measured, goal by goal
One row for each goal a registered study measured something for. One column for each kind of thing that could be measured.
Registered studies list 4 outcome measures that RNAWiki could read. A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. 0 of the matched studies tested this substance, and 0 posted a result.
There is no single score. A strong test result and a weak life result are different facts.
Goals down the side, kinds of measurement across the top. Each cell says what kind of thing was registered, not what was found.
Goal
Life outcome
What a body can do
How a person feels
A test result
A step in the body
Harms
How long
Who was studied
Mood
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a performance measure for this goal.
…Waiting for a reviewer1 registered symptom measure.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a test result for this goal.
∅Nothing in the sources checkedNo registered study lists a body-step measure for this goal.
—Not recordedHarms were not a registered measure for this goal.
—Not recordedNo finished study window is recorded.
…Waiting for a reviewerWho was studied is listed further down the page.
Which registered measures put each goal on this table
Mood
hospital anxiety and depression scale
Sorted by fixed word lists, version v1. A name the rules do not recognise stays unsorted rather than moving to the nearest column.
What each mark on this table means
∅ Nothing in the sources checked
No registered study lists a life outcome for this goal.
… Waiting for a reviewer
1 registered symptom measure.
— Not recorded
Harms were not a registered measure for this goal.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What happened in people
Each card is one study: the exact question it asked, who was in it, and whether it showed what it set out to show.
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Prescriptions of antibiotics
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT06452199
How many people
1000
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Response Scale (GSRS) constipation symptom score
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT03056846
How many people
634
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Proportion of days without cold/flu
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT01709825
How many people
583
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Absentia between BB536 vs. Placebo children in daycare centers due to diarrhea and/or respiratory-related illnesses
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT02434042
How many people
520
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
geographic mean of the increase of antibody titreq against at least one flu strain among the 3 forming the flu vaccine ( H1N1, H3, N and B ) within 3 weeks after flu vaccination
✗ The study did not show it
Who was studied
NCT01652066
How many people
430
Study design
Not applicable
Compared against
Not recorded for this study
Kind of result
A number that stands in for health
What was found
Result not recorded on this page
Repeated elsewhere
Unreplicated
What this does not prove. A study that did not show an effect does not show that no effect exists anywhere.
The limits of this study, and where it came from
Main limit. No limitation is recorded for this study.
How far it carries. This study is recorded from the curated record, not from the registry match.
Form and route.
Interval reported. Not recorded in this summary
Written into the record, not signed off as a reviewed claim.
NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
Europe PMC · a recorded source, not a stored snapshot
What we know
RNAWiki holds 6 written-up human studies for this substance, each with the question it asked.
How we know it
Each card names the study, the number of people and what the study set out to measure.
What this does not prove
These summaries were written by a person and have not been signed off as reviewed claims.
Why it matters
A study that failed is as informative as one that worked, and both are here.
What we still do not know
No reviewed claim exists, so no exact population, effect size or interval is published yet.
What happened in people◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
How close this is to real life
The top step is something a person would feel or care about. The bottom is a guess from software. Filled steps are where evidence exists for this substance.
□Living longer, or avoiding a major eventNo evidence recorded. Death, a heart attack, a stroke, a hospital stay.No registered study measures this.
□What a body can do day to dayNo evidence recorded. Walking, dressing, breathing, recovering.No registered study measures this.
□Measured performanceNo evidence recorded. How much was lifted, how far was run, how fast.No registered study measures this.
■Symptoms and quality of lifeEvidence recorded. Pain, tiredness, mood, sleep, as the person rated it.1 registered measure of this kind.
□A number that stands in for healthNo evidence recorded. Cholesterol, blood sugar, bone density. A stand-in, not the thing itself.No registered study measures this.
■A step measured inside a personEvidence recorded. Something measured in human tissue or human cells.A human record sits on the stored organism ladder.
■AnimalsEvidence recorded. Mice, rats, dogs. Useful for ideas, not proof about people.Stored records in C. elegans (roundworm), Mouse. A result in animals says what to test next. It does not say what happens in people.
■Cells in a dishEvidence recorded. Cells or chemistry on a bench, far from a whole body.Stored mechanism abstracts describe steps measured in cells or tissue.
□A guess from softwareNo evidence recorded. Nobody measured it. RNAWiki never publishes one as a finding.RNAWiki stores no prediction for this record. Software can suggest a link. RNAWiki does not publish one as a finding.
Higher on these steps means closer to something a person would feel. It does not mean better done.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Felt, measured, or meaningful
Three different things that get called the same word. Registered studies measured all three, and mixing them is how a blood test becomes a health claim.
Felt
Things a person could notice without a test.
hospital anxiety and depression scale
Measured
Things only a test, a scale or a device shows.
No registered study measured anything of this kind.
Meaningful
Things that change how a life goes, not only a number.
No registered study measured anything of this kind.
A registered study says what someone planned to measure. It does not say what they found. A number moving is not the same as a life going better. The two are shown apart here.
Felt, but not shown to help. A person notices a change. No study showed it leads anywhere good.
Measured, but not felt. A number moves. The person notices nothing. Both can be true.
Measured, but not shown to matter. A number moves in the good direction. Nobody showed that lives went better.
Matters, but takes years. The result that counts may take longer than anyone would keep watching.
Names that fit none of the three (3)
development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea
development of clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea
intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms
These are harms, study-process measures, or names the rules did not recognise. They are shown rather than dropped.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Were people like you studied?
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it, and where the result stops carrying.
Who was studied
No description of who was studied is recorded.
Who is missing from the studies
Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
Where the result stopped carrying
This is a scope explorer, not a diagnosis engine.
It shows who was studied so you can see whether people similar to you were included.
RNAWiki cannot tell whether a study fits you. It can show who was in it.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Why it might seem to do nothing
A real effect and a noticed effect are different things. These are the recorded reasons the two come apart.
It was studied for a different goal
The studies measured something else entirely.
On this record: Some registered studies measured things that match no goal on this page.
It was studied in different people
The people in the studies were not much like the reader.
On this record: Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
The evidence may simply be wrong
Small early studies often do not hold up.
On this record: RNAWiki has not yet published a reviewed conclusion for this use.
Other reasons RNAWiki checked and found nothing for (10)
A different form was studied
The studied form is not the form on the shelf. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
There was nothing to correct
Where a level is already normal, topping it up may change nothing. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else had to happen too
In the studies it was paired with training, a diet or another treatment. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The change is too small to feel
A real change can still sit below what a person notices. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Day-to-day swing hides it
Sleep, food, stress and time of day move most numbers more than this would. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Not enough time yet
The studies ran longer than the person has waited. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
It was not taken as studied
Missed days change the result, and studies count them. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
Something else changed at the same time
Two changes at once cannot be told apart afterwards. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
The product may not be what it says
Contents of a sold product are not always what the label states. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
No recorded reason
RNAWiki has nothing stored that would explain it. Nothing in this record points to this reason.
None of these is a reason to take more. Taking more is not a step this page ever suggests.
What it would be like to take◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
What taking it involves
The recorded facts about getting hold of it and using it. Nothing here is a suggestion about what you should do.
How it is supplied
Varies by country
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
Read from the recorded approval status.
No source is stored against this line.
Form and route
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No form or route is recorded.
No source is stored against this line.
Who oversees it
Not usually supervised: sold as a supplement or food ingredient where recorded. That is a legal category, not a safety judgement.
❝ Quoted from a source
Where this came from
Copied from a source RNAWiki stored, with the source named.
The identity record classes it as a botanical or organism preparation; no register records an approval.
No source is stored against this line.
What is in the pack
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing is recorded about product quality.
No source is stored against this line.
Where it is registered
Regulatory records are listed in the technical disclosure at the foot of this page.
# Counted from records
Where this came from
A count of rows RNAWiki holds. It describes our records, not your body.
Register entries are stored per jurisdiction and shown with their dates.
No source is stored against this line.
Why people stop
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
No record of why people stopped taking it is stored for this substance.
No source is stored against this line.
What it would be like to take∅Nothing found in the sources checked
What can go wrong
Sorted by where each line came from. A regulator's label and a report somebody sent in are not the same kind of fact.
∅Nothing found in the sources checked
No harm is recorded against this substance in the sources RNAWiki checked. Finding nothing is not the same as showing there is nothing.
The sources listed were searched and held nothing. That is not the same as nothing existing.
Over a long time. No completed tested study window is recorded, so long-term effects are not established by the registry record.
Groups the studies covered thinly. Which groups were under-represented in the studies has not been recorded for this substance. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, older adults, and people with liver or kidney conditions are commonly excluded from trials; nothing here says whether they were.
What is missing or unclear◇Read from sources, not yet reviewed
Does the exact form matter?
Evidence belongs to the exact thing that was tested. A different salt, a different mixture or a different preparation is a different question.
The form that was studied
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
The exact form studied is not recorded.
No source is stored against this line.
What is sold
Not recorded.
∅ Nothing recorded
Where this came from
RNAWiki holds nothing here and says so rather than guessing.
Nothing further is recorded about which forms are sold.
No source is stored against this line.
What is recorded as being sold
2127 marketed supplement labels list this ingredient, classed as non-nutrient/non-botanical, other combinations and bacteria.
Those labels carry all other, nutrient and structure/function claims. A claim of that kind is written by the manufacturer and is not assessed by any regulator, so its presence says nothing about whether it is true.
This order is fixed in code and does not count clicks or time on the page.
What is not here
7 questions this page could not answer
These sections were prepared and left out because there was nothing to put in them. They are listed rather than hidden, so the gaps in this record are visible.
The path through the body — found nothing in the sources checked.
How long anything takes — found nothing in the sources checked.
What it may clash with — found nothing in the sources checked.
Other ways to the same goal — found nothing in the sources checked.
Claims that go past the evidence — found nothing in the sources checked.
How this medicine reached us — found nothing in the sources checked.
What changed on this page — found nothing in the sources checked.
The record as stored
The full record, for auditing
Everything above is built from what is below. This layer keeps the technical vocabulary, record identifiers and every stored row, so a reader who wants to check the page can.
Recorded evidence blocks (9)
Q1
What did Bifidobacterium Longum's largest trial (634 people) and its longest (3.8 years) measure?
634 people in Bifidobacterium Longum's largest registered study, 3.8 years in its longest registered window, measuring Points of probiotics intervention in aging population. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
8 na, 2 phase2, 1 phase1, 1 phase3; NCT04585984; 2024-11-14. Last human test completed 2025, NCT05054309.
Interpretation These counts include studies where Bifidobacterium Longum was a comparison treatment, a background treatment or an exposure in an observational study, and the longest window may be a planned end date. Trial roles have not yet been classified for this record.
Show the evidence
na
8
phase2
2
phase1
1
phase3
1
Last recorded human testNCT05054309
2025-02-14
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q2
From C. elegans to human: where has Bifidobacterium Longum shown lifespan?
Interpretation Points of probiotics intervention in aging population — the recorded outcome words.
Show the evidence
C. elegans
lifespan
mouse
lifespan
humanNCT04911556
mechanism-only; Points of probiotics intervention in aging population; 10
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q3
Could one person measure Bifidobacterium Longum's effect on development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea?
Development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: measured in Bifidobacterium Longum's trials.
Interpretation development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea is the recorded endpoint.
Show the evidence
biomarkers
development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea; 2026-09-01
development of clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea; 2026-09-01
hospital anxiety and depression scale; 2026-09-01
intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms; 2026-09-01
Not recorded for this substance
a recorded half-life; a small human trial reporting an effect
Q4
Which of development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea, development of clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea and hospital anxiety and depression scale did Bifidobacterium Longum's trials measure?
development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea, development of clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea and hospital anxiety and depression scale lead 4 outcome terms across Bifidobacterium Longum's trials. ClinicalTrials.gov · 2026-09-01
Interpretation intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms follow.
Show the evidence
development of antibiotic associated diarrhoea
1
development of clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea
1
hospital anxiety and depression scale
1
intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms
1
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q5
Which of Bifidobacterium Longum's 3 ongoing trials reports first?
The number of days without SIRS within 14 days; Change from baseline in the intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms; latest 2027-03-31
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT06639516
"Therapeutic Effect of Bifidobacterium Longum in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial"; n 60; "The number of days without SIRS within 14 days"; 2025-12-01
NCT07420231
"Evaluation of the Synergistic Effect of Combining a Prebiotic and a Postbiotic on Intestinal Discomfort"; n 140; "Change from baseline in the intensity and frequency of intestinal symptoms"; 2026-12-24
NCT07705659
"A Probiotic for Health Outcomes in Short-Term Overseas Travel"; n 40; "Changes in gut microbiota in healthy Chinese adults taking probiotic during short-term overseas travel (within 7 days) compared to placebo"; 2027-03-31
recorded 2026-09-01 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q6
Which 3 trials of Bifidobacterium Longum posted no result?
Posted no result
3 of 3 completed trials
Registrations
NCT00973908, NCT01276626 and NCT03056846
Completion dates
oldest 2012-12; newest 2018-02-05
Show the evidence
Trial
NCT00973908
2012-12
NCT01276626
2014-06
NCT03056846
2018-02-05
Q7
At the median, Bifidobacterium Longum's trials enrolled 122 people — anything larger?
Median enrolment
122
Largest enrolment
634
Registered trials counted
10
Q8
Was Bifidobacterium Longum studied with exercise?
exercise is named in Bifidobacterium Longum's label sentences: "We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test a 12-week multimodal lifestyle intervention comprising exercise and dietary guidance involving daily consumption of yogurt containing <i>Bifidobacterium longum</i> BB536 on DNA methylation-based aging measures in overweight men aged ≥50 years." openfda-label+europepmc · 2026-05-29
1 recorded statement; exercise
Show the evidence
exercise
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test a 12-week multimodal lifestyle intervention comprising exercise and dietary guidance involving daily consumption of yogurt containing <i>Bifidobacterium longum</i> BB536 on DNA methylation-based aging measures in overweight men aged ≥50 years.
recorded 2026-05-29 · last checked 2026-09-04
Q9
What is recorded about Bifidobacterium Longum and AMPK?
"Herein, we investigated the impacts of <i>Lactobacillus (Lactiplantibacillus) plantarum</i> P111 and <i>Bifidobacterium longum</i> P121, which suppressed dexamethasone-induced adipogenesis in 3T3 L1 cells and increased lipopolysaccharide-suppressed AMPK activation in HepG2 cells, on HFD-induced obesity, liver steatosis, gut inflammation…" — where Bifidobacterium Longum and AMPK appear together. Europe PMC · pathway abstract search · 2024-11-07
AMPK; PMID 39599597
Show the evidence
AMPKPMID 39599597
"Herein, we investigated the impacts of <i>Lactobacillus (Lactiplantibacillus) plantarum</i> P111 and <i>Bifidobacterium longum</i> P121, which suppressed dexamethasone-induced adipogenesis in 3T3 L1 cells and increased lipopolysaccharide-suppressed AMPK activation in HepG2 cells, on HFD-induced obesity, liver steatosis, gut inflammation and dysbiosis, and depression/cognitive impairment…"
recorded 2024-11-07 · last checked 2026-09-04
Where it is registeredIdentifiers, relations and other names
ClinicalTrials.gov — US Government work · Europe PMC — metadata only, under the recorded legal gate · derived from this page's own recorded fields; no external licence · openFDA / DailyMed — US Government work
✗ required summary fields resolved: 3 required field(s) not terminal: Best-supported result, Biggest unanswered question, Human evidence
✓ public claims reviewed: 0 reviewed claim(s); drafts are never rendered
✓ source coverage passed: 6 source rows
✓ no critical contamination: no quarantine open
✓ canonical metadata passed: slug and display name present
✓ no raw internal fields: enforced by the copy-contract test over the rendered page
This is a record of evidence. It is not medical advice, and it does not say this substance suits you. Nothing here says any substance on RNAWiki is appropriate for a child.